Evolution - September 2000
By Author

Starting: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:54:37 EDT
Ending: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 22:33:12 EDT

• Axel Dorscht
  • Announcement - IHCMD Online Study Program (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:25:16 EDT)
• Bertvan@aol.com
  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 16:19:43 EDT)
  • Response to Baylor (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 12:57:22 EDT)
  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 10:38:37 EDT)
  • Subj: Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 19:24:06 EDT)
  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 12:28:29 EDT)
  • Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 11:25:51 EDT)
  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 16:50:47 EDT)
  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 12:53:04 EDT)
  • Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 10:09:51 EDT)
  • What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 20:04:18 EDT)
  • What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 15:41:38 EDT)
  • "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 17:55:24 EDT)
  • "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 17:26:26 EDT)
  • "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 16:01:03 EDT)
  • "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 13:55:08 EDT)
  • "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 10:31:21 EDT)
  • "Apparent" Trap (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 09:47:04 EDT)
  • The "Apparent" Trap (Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:25:28 EDT)
  • Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:07:04 EDT)
  • But is it science (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 15:57:50 EDT)
  • Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 15:43:36 EDT)
  • But is it science? (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 13:41:49 EDT)
  • fear of the religious implications of design (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:22:37 EDT)
  • Great posts (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:05:57 EDT)
  • Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 18:53:40 EDT)
  • Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 16:59:05 EDT)
  • Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 16:12:02 EDT)
  • Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 13:23:01 EDT)
  • filters (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:53:02 EDT)
  • filter (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:20:37 EDT)
  • Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 17:16:13 EDT)
  • We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 15:44:01 EDT)
  • Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 15:14:00 EDT)
  • We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 10:17:21 EDT)
  • repost for Bertvan (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 20:43:26 EDT)
  • Teleology (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 14:15:26 EDT)
  • Teleology (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 13:44:52 EDT)
  • Question to FMAJ (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:38:34 EDT)
  • Teleology (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:24:51 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 16:06:20 EDT)
  • WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 15:50:57 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 12:52:47 EDT)
  • WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 18:05:10 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 14:06:27 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 09:47:39 EDT)
  • Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 17:30:10 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 19:24:09 EDT)
  • Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 16:16:03 EDT)
  • Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 13:06:17 EDT)
  • Definitions of ID (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 11:59:19 EDT)
  • Definitions of ID (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 17:10:15 EDT)
  • A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 19:08:33 EDT)
  • A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 10:58:46 EDT)
  • ID vs.>? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 13:49:27 EDT)
  • ID vs.? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 12:47:21 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 17:23:45 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 15:45:58 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 11:05:42 EDT)
• Bill Payne
  • Re: hugh ross (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 00:11:27 EDT)
• billwald@juno.com
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 12:47:17 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 15:03:56 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 22:03:09 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 14:28:46 EDT)
  • human selection (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 13:09:29 EDT)
  • hugh ross (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 12:38:36 EDT)
  • Re: The "Apparent" Trap (Sat Sep 23 2000 - 20:16:28 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 14:45:25 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 01:36:46 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 22:47:35 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 23:23:13 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:26:35 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 16:34:51 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1 (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 16:07:47 EDT)
  • Re: belief based upon faith? (was ID vs.?) (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 22:09:42 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 12:29:40 EDT)
  • Re: important question (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 12:51:03 EDT)
  • important question (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 18:24:44 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 12:34:38 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 21:19:53 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 15:40:37 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 14:53:53 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 15:09:00 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 22:43:24 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 00:12:16 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 12:47:12 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 00:38:10 EDT)
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1 (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 20:58:16 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1 (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 00:39:57 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1 (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 20:36:59 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 23:31:55 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 22:48:50 EDT)
  • Re: irreducible simplicity (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:55:27 EDT)
  • Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 19:20:18 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 19:40:28 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 20:13:09 EDT)
  • Re: Latest on the 2LOT (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 15:56:34 EDT)
  • Re: Latest on the 2LOT (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 20:49:43 EDT)
  • Re: Latest on the 2LOT (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 20:25:35 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 00:31:07 EDT)
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: Why Does the Universe Work? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 02:24:50 EDT)
  • Re: Subj: Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 23:52:59 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 16:38:20 EDT)
  • "Apparent" CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 15:02:27 EDT)
  • Limits on the production of complexity (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 14:27:00 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:36:42 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:32:52 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 10:28:08 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 09:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: Why Does the Universe Work? (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 09:40:52 EDT)
  • Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 09:27:03 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 08:39:22 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 09:30:36 EDT)
  • Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 09:25:42 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 03:50:16 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 00:22:35 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 23:49:37 EDT)
  • What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 14:39:19 EDT)
  • Re: Does Selection Exist?, part 2 (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 09:15:02 EDT)
  • Re: A THIRD OF U.S. SCHOOLS DON'T TEACH EVOLUTION (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 01:07:56 EDT)
  • Does Selection Exist?, part 2 (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 01:02:38 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 23:53:16 EDT)
  • Re: Flat Earth Society still exists (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 13:41:29 EDT)
  • Flat Earth Society still exists (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 12:28:43 EDT)
  • Re: the vertebrate eye a `kludge'? (was Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc.) (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 00:26:45 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 00:25:15 EDT)
  • Re: The "Apparent" Trap (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:51:40 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:47:10 EDT)
  • Evolution in One Dimension, and Some of its Implications (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:23:12 EDT)
  • The "Apparent" Trap (Sat Sep 23 2000 - 14:04:10 EDT)
  • Schutzenberger's Folly, part 2 (Sat Sep 23 2000 - 02:11:30 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc. #2 (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 15:27:16 EDT)
  • Re: no chance (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 12:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc. #2 (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 02:53:06 EDT)
  • Re: Design, Intelligent Design & irreducible complexity (was ID vs.?) (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 09:09:06 EDT)
  • A Metaphor for Evolution, and more (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 14:24:44 EDT)
  • RE: CSI and algorithms: (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 02:24:53 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 14:44:07 EDT)
  • Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 08:53:03 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1 (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 16:36:50 EDT)
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 23:47:01 EDT)
  • Re: More on CSI (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 11:25:18 EDT)
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 11:21:25 EDT)
  • Re: Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 00:58:56 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 00:39:54 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 09:38:02 EDT)
  • Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1 (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 00:40:53 EDT)
  • RE: Will the real designer please stand up? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 08:29:10 EDT)
  • Will the real designer please stand up? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 09:09:19 EDT)
  • Re: Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 02:01:06 EDT)
  • Why Randomness is a *Good* Thing for Evolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 20:58:14 EDT)
  • Re: Evolution of biological complexity (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 20:53:34 EDT)
  • Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc. (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 16:18:27 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 02:30:00 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 00:48:12 EDT)
  • WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 00:06:18 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 09:08:59 EDT)
  • ID theory typology, religion, and why I care (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 02:15:06 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 02:19:04 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 00:20:06 EDT)
  • A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 00:31:07 EDT)
  • The Idea of Design (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 02:12:20 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 00:32:27 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 00:20:01 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 12:48:01 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:56:39 EDT)
• Cliff Hamrick
  • Re: To Calvin Webmaster (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 08:57:46 EDT)
  • To Calvin Webmaster (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 08:21:22 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:54:33 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 10:14:03 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 09:21:22 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs.? (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 07:50:14 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 13:59:01 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 11:57:02 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID? (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 11:19:28 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 06:46:46 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 06:46:54 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 06:55:03 EDT)
• Cliff Lundberg
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 19:34:32 EDT)
  • Re: Life may have started in undersea vents (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 23:52:17 EDT)
  • DNA sequences (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 15:13:55 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 04:12:34 EDT)
• coryrockwell@yahoo.com
  • Down with the NWO Campaign (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 20:06:53 EDT)
• David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 11:34:59 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:19:44 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 18:20:11 EDT)
• FMAJ1019@aol.com
  • Re: Glen Morton Waco Conference reports (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 18:24:20 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 16:27:36 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 15:09:00 EDT)
  • Glen Morton Waco Conference reports (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 14:55:27 EDT)
  • IDT criticized: Meta list (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 14:37:09 EDT)
  • Ruse's recantation? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 14:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: Response to Baylor (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 14:12:32 EDT)
  • Re: Response to Baylor (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 13:47:36 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:16:40 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:11:36 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:00:30 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:00:31 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:00:23 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 12:17:45 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 11:45:31 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 23:41:24 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 23:35:06 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 22:47:09 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 22:39:05 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 12:07:09 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 12:02:39 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 11:59:10 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 11:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: A THIRD OF U.S. SCHOOLS DON'T TEACH EVOLUTION (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 12:17:57 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 23:28:27 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 00:10:15 EDT)
  • Re: the vertebrate eye a `kludge'? (was Problems with selectionism, remarks o... (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 00:09:17 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 22:14:40 EDT)
  • Re: no chance (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 22:13:44 EDT)
  • Re: genetic drift & RM&NS (was Blood clotting and IC'ness?) (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 22:13:45 EDT)
  • Darwinism Defeated? (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 22:13:42 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 22:12:55 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 17:26:19 EDT)
  • Re: no chance (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 11:56:03 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 23:38:59 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 23:21:33 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 23:19:55 EDT)
  • Genetic drift (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:44:45 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:57:44 EDT)
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:42:56 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:41:03 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:33:29 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:10:35 EDT)
  • Re: `intelligent natural forces' (was filter) (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:10:31 EDT)
  • Re: But is it science? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:10:34 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:10:26 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 00:12:33 EDT)
  • Re: URL problems and CSI (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 00:04:05 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 00:00:32 EDT)
  • Re: CSI and algorithms: (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 23:55:25 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 23:47:36 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 23:43:49 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 23:39:28 EDT)
  • Re: filter (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:04:58 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 03:05:35 EDT)
  • Two edged sword? (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 21:16:38 EDT)
  • Intelligent design under the microscope (1 of ??) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 21:15:31 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:54:29 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:54:23 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:54:11 EDT)
  • Re: Great posts (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:54:34 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 1/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:54:21 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 1/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:54:18 EDT)
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 23:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 23:33:40 EDT)
  • Biotic message (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 21:07:05 EDT)
  • Peppered moth again? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 21:01:31 EDT)
  • Intelligent design and science (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 20:56:09 EDT)
  • Re: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 13:59:49 EDT)
  • Re: More on CSI (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 13:56:39 EDT)
  • More on CSI (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 01:15:46 EDT)
  • CSI and algorithms: (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 01:13:49 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 01:04:59 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 01:01:22 EDT)
  • How could evolution result in IC systems? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 00:59:03 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 00:57:37 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 00:43:46 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 00:26:54 EDT)
  • Re: filters (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 23:57:24 EDT)
  • Re: filter (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 23:57:22 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:33:20 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:28:05 EDT)
  • Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:17:40 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:17:48 EDT)
  • Re: prima facie design hypothesis (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:02:10 EDT)
  • Re: IC & ID (ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:59:30 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:52:43 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:49:20 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:44:15 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:38:04 EDT)
  • Re: IC & ID (ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:45 EDT)
  • Re: IC & ID (ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:44 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:46 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:47 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:42 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:48 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:37 EDT)
  • Re: Question to Nelson (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:41 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:39 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:43 EDT)
  • Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:34 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:33 EDT)
  • Re: prima facie design hypothesis (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:23:38 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:43:18 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:43:17 EDT)
  • Re: Will the real designer please stand up? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 00:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: Teleology (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 00:16:59 EDT)
  • Re: Teleology (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 00:18:04 EDT)
  • Re: Teleology (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 00:15:30 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it (was ID vs. ?) (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 00:10:12 EDT)
  • Re: An Evaluation of Ten Recent Biology Textbooks (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:43:03 EDT)
  • Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:35:11 EDT)
  • Re: irreducible simplicity (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:28:47 EDT)
  • Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:25:54 EDT)
  • Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:23:06 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:20:44 EDT)
  • Re: Question to Nelson (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:17:43 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:11:06 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:09:47 EDT)
  • Re: Question to FMAJ (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 22:59:26 EDT)
  • Re: Question to FMAJ (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 22:55:41 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:11:01 EDT)
  • Fwd: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:03:49 EDT)
  • Re: Life may have started in undersea vents (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:55:01 EDT)
  • Question to Nelson (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:50:52 EDT)
  • Fwd: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:45:14 EDT)
  • Re: Will the real designer please stand up? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:39:06 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:35:22 EDT)
  • Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 23:57:02 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 01:07:48 EDT)
  • Does Irreducible Complexity refute neo-Darwinism? (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 01:03:23 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 00:03:21 EDT)
  • Re: Why Randomness is a *Good* Thing for Evolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 22:42:36 EDT)
  • Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 17:33:09 EDT)
  • Evolution of biological complexity (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 17:21:55 EDT)
  • Behe on theories (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 16:21:38 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 16:11:18 EDT)
  • Contradictions ? was Re: ID vs. ? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 14:16:29 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 14:08:11 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 13:58:11 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 13:29:16 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 03:38:40 EDT)
  • Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 17:28:55 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 15:14:01 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 15:09:37 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 15:05:28 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 14:58:05 EDT)
  • ID: Design vs designer (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 00:26:53 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 23:40:37 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 23:42:09 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 23:18:13 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 23:02:19 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 13:44:43 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 13:35:42 EDT)
  • Intelligent design defined? (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 22:44:55 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 17:38:48 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 16:16:59 EDT)
  • Definitions of ID? (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 14:33:24 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 21:05:48 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 14:53:00 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 14:51:24 EDT)
  • Re: Design Theory (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:47:30 EDT)
  • Re: The Idea of Design (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:44:00 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.>? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:39:15 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:38:37 EDT)
  • Re: The Idea of Design (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:33:20 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:30:59 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:22:41 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 11:49:19 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:12:58 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:17:37 EDT)
  • Evolution of biological information (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:06:24 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:05:10 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:00:38 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:03:08 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:59:49 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:57:04 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:54:31 EDT)
• HotStock@real.com
  • Why So Much Smart Money Is So High on Read-Rite !! (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 11:28:50 EDT)
  • Why So Much Smart Money Is So High on Read-Rite !! (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 09:07:52 EDT)
• Howard J. Van Till
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 14:01:43 EDT)
  • Re: Why Does the Universe Work? (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 10:04:32 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 09:43:11 EDT)
  • Why Does the Universe Work? (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 09:01:03 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 08:53:51 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 15:20:09 EDT)
  • Re: A THIRD OF U.S. SCHOOLS DON'T TEACH EVOLUTION (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 09:18:09 EDT)
  • Re: Another Filter Problem (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 09:06:44 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 13:42:05 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:41:43 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 10:32:38 EDT)
• Huxter4441@aol.com
  • Fwd: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 10:14:14 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 13:08:55 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:44:19 EDT)
  • Re: repost for Bertvan (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:18:19 EDT)
  • Re: An Evaluation of Ten Recent Biology Textbooks (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:10:42 EDT)
• info@vteams.com
  • Vteams Fantasy Sports (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 01:25:51 EDT)
• Ivar Ylvisaker
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 00:51:59 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 00:46:08 EDT)
  • Another Filter Problem (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 01:08:58 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 01:02:12 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 01:49:22 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 01:25:36 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 22:41:11 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 00:54:36 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 23:49:30 EDT)
• Jay Richards
  • RE: Paul Nelson Lecture, University of CO., Boulder, Sept. 20 (now NY conference) (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 19:07:46 EDT)
  • Paul Nelson Lecture, University of CO., Boulder, Sept. 20 (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 18:02:42 EDT)
• Marcio Pie
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 14:25:48 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 08:19:23 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroe (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 17:47:52 EDT)
• Nelson Alonso
  • RE: CSI and algorithms: (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:50:02 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:45:31 EDT)
  • RE: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:42:02 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:22:27 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:08:49 EDT)
  • RE: filter (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 11:35:04 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:56:58 EDT)
  • RE: filter (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:46:16 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:45:05 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:42:51 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:35:37 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:30:36 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:12:39 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:03:18 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:02:11 EDT)
  • RE: prima facie design hypothesis (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 11:55:27 EDT)
  • RE: Paul Nelson Lecture, University of CO., Boulder, Sept. 20 (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 18:13:36 EDT)
  • RE: We heard you (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 14:34:38 EDT)
  • RE: We heard you (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 14:27:54 EDT)
  • RE: Will the real designer please stand up? (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 14:07:02 EDT)
  • RE: IC & ID (ID vs. ?) (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 13:42:49 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 11:51:05 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 10:57:28 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 10:30:28 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:59:00 EDT)
  • RE: repost for Bertvan (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:48:17 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:46:45 EDT)
  • RE: Question to Nelson (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:22:13 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:16:55 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:14:14 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:57:30 EDT)
  • RE: We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:53:25 EDT)
  • RE: We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:28:58 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 17:49:15 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 17:29:10 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 15:56:03 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 14:38:39 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 13:28:34 EDT)
  • RE: Question to Nelson (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:50:33 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:37:15 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:34:54 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:27:54 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:42:57 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:31:08 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:14:02 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 10:56:42 EDT)
  • RE: Will the real designer please stand up? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 10:44:21 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 18:10:34 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 16:14:33 EDT)
  • Re:ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 13:47:56 EDT)
  • Re:Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 13:47:13 EDT)
• Nucacids@aol.com
  • Re: Glen Morton Waco Conference reports (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 22:32:35 EDT)
  • Re: IDT criticized: Meta list (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 15:37:43 EDT)
  • NONA?...not (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 19:03:42 EDT)
• Patrick
  • Restore Your Liver & Immune System Naturally! (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 19:26:08 EDT)
• Paul Nelson
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 12:23:47 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 10:40:50 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 12:51:04 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection as cause of events with CSI property (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 12:58:20 EDT)
  • Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 20:51:45 EDT)
• Ralph Krumdieck
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 13:01:28 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 14:42:27 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 00:53:33 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 00:49:55 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 18:59:51 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 16:22:53 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 15:41:56 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 12:51:29 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 23:23:36 EDT)
  • Re: The "Apparent" Trap (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 02:20:59 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 02:13:01 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 02:40:04 EDT)
  • New species (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 02:51:56 EDT)
  • RE: How could evolution result in IC systems? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 20:24:10 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 12:20:03 EDT)
  • Re: Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 17:34:09 EDT)
  • Re: Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 16:28:57 EDT)
  • Re: Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 14:42:16 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 10:52:02 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 11:20:26 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 14:15:08 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 10:28:19 EDT)
  • RE: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 16:32:04 EDT)
  • Re: Teleology (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 13:56:04 EDT)
  • Re: important question (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 11:23:14 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 01:39:28 EDT)
  • Re: important question (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 01:48:59 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 02:33:58 EDT)
• Richard Wein
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 16:59:25 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 08:50:10 EDT)
  • Re: CSI stuff (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 03:24:21 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 03:22:55 EDT)
  • Re: More on CSI (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 12:16:38 EDT)
  • Re: Design, Intelligent Design & irreducible complexity (was ID vs.?) (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 12:11:52 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 08:01:56 EDT)
  • Re: Life may have started in undersea vents (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 05:22:06 EDT)
  • Re: Behe on theories (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 04:05:15 EDT)
  • Re: ID: Design vs designer (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 03:56:49 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 12:37:58 EDT)
  • Another inconsistency in the ID position (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 12:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sat Sep 09 2000 - 07:36:43 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 08:26:36 EDT)
  • Re: Latest on the 2LOT (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 04:37:45 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 04:52:24 EDT)
  • Latest on the 2LOT (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 17:52:19 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:02:40 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 09:39:11 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 15:59:55 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 05:15:14 EDT)
  • Re: The Idea of Design (Sat Sep 02 2000 - 04:54:47 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 04:22:50 EDT)
• schooled@unbounded.com
  • Homeschooler (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 20:47:30 EDT)
• Stephen E. Jones
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 18:39:07 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 19:01:22 EDT)
  • Re: belief based upon faith? (was ID vs.?) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:04:22 EDT)
  • Re: Life may have started in undersea vents (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:04:41 EDT)
  • Re: everybody has got some kind of metaphysics (was Life may have started in undersea vents) (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:21:50 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:19:51 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:18:42 EDT)
  • Re: genetic drift & RM&NS (was Blood clotting and IC'ness?) (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:17:44 EDT)
  • Re: the vertebrate eye a `kludge'? (was Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc.) (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 18:17:02 EDT)
  • Re: no chance (Sun Sep 24 2000 - 08:49:19 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc. #3 (Sat Sep 23 2000 - 06:51:18 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 18:56:59 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc. #2 (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 18:40:44 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with selectionism, remarks on order, etc., etc. #1 (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 18:39:18 EDT)
  • Re: `intelligent natural forces' (was filter) (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 18:53:28 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 18:18:06 EDT)
  • Re: Fungi May Have Joined First Plants on Land (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 18:13:30 EDT)
  • Re: Its all over for ID-the ulitmate thought of evolution has been thought! (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 18:09:14 EDT)
  • Re: Design, Intelligent Design & irreducible complexity (was ID vs.?) (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 18:18:41 EDT)
  • Re: 1. my new email management strategy, 2. evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 18:42:45 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 18:39:46 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 18:52:02 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 18:48:45 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 18:51:23 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 06:19:43 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 1/2 (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Sep 17 2000 - 18:45:29 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 20:29:04 EDT)
  • RE: a cosmic Rube Goldberg! (was Blood clotting and IC'ness?) (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 19:50:53 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Sat Sep 16 2000 - 05:27:35 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 17:46:27 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 08:32:10 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 10:12:37 EDT)
  • Re: IC & ID (ID vs. ?) (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 17:47:25 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 18:37:05 EDT)
  • Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it (was ID vs. ?) (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 18:17:49 EDT)
  • Re: belief based upon faith? (was ID vs.?) (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 18:17:00 EDT)
  • Re: An Evaluation of Ten Recent Biology Textbooks (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 18:14:33 EDT)
  • Re: Life may have started in undersea vents (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 10:11:53 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 01:42:34 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 20:10:10 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs.? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 18:16:00 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 18:03:21 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 02:48:37 EDT)
  • Re: Neanderthal find hailed??? (Sun Sep 03 2000 - 05:25:13 EDT)
• Susan Brassfield Cogan
  • Re: Glen Morton Waco Conference reports (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 18:00:16 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 10:56:24 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 00:03:02 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 15:24:36 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 19:40:52 EDT)
  • Re: What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (*Again*) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 10:40:29 EDT)
  • Re: human selection (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 13:01:05 EDT)
  • Thought for Tuesday, Sep 26, 2000 (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 10:34:09 EDT)
  • A THIRD OF U.S. SCHOOLS DON'T TEACH EVOLUTION (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 19:10:29 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 19:08:41 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 17:32:42 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 16:39:22 EDT)
  • Re: "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 15:08:48 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 12:56:59 EDT)
  • Re: The "Apparent" Trap (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 12:42:00 EDT)
  • Re: no chance (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 11:03:41 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 17:02:50 EDT)
  • no chance (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 15:21:55 EDT)
  • Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 10:47:04 EDT)
  • Re: But is it science (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 17:39:30 EDT)
  • Re: But is it science? (Wed Sep 20 2000 - 15:11:31 EDT)
  • RE: CSI and algorithms: (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 15:24:22 EDT)
  • The Wedge Project (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 13:02:01 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:44:16 EDT)
  • Re: Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 17:34:30 EDT)
  • Re: Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 16:10:35 EDT)
  • Re: Superb web site (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:49:10 EDT)
  • Re: filter (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:35:23 EDT)
  • Superb web site (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 17:28:56 EDT)
  • Re: To Calvin Webmaster (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 13:51:39 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:56:11 EDT)
  • Re: We heard you (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 10:29:02 EDT)
  • Re: repost for Bertvan (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 22:14:51 EDT)
  • repost for Bertvan (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 18:31:56 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 18:14:16 EDT)
  • Re: Teleology (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 15:19:23 EDT)
  • Re: Question to FMAJ (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 13:13:22 EDT)
  • Re: Teleology (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:49:38 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 21:05:09 EDT)
  • re: Definitions of ID (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 20:41:23 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 20:24:49 EDT)
  • Re: Life may have started in undersea vents (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 20:07:38 EDT)
  • Re: DNA sequences (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 15:33:42 EDT)
  • Re: important question (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 12:54:42 EDT)
  • Re: WWYD - What Would You Do to make evolution work?? (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 12:50:11 EDT)
  • Re: important question (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 10:47:42 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 17:43:17 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 15:22:16 EDT)
  • RE: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 12:52:53 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 10:41:26 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 09:29:41 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Fri Sep 08 2000 - 09:26:33 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 12:53:42 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 17:41:15 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 11:50:17 EDT)
  • Re: A problem with ID-theorists' view of macroevolution (Mon Sep 04 2000 - 10:12:02 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 23:07:04 EDT)
  • Design Theory (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 15:03:17 EDT)
• SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
  • prima facie design hypothesis (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 12:27:45 EDT)
  • irreducible simplicity (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 17:09:10 EDT)
  • Re: Definitions of ID (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 14:12:20 EDT)
• Tedd Hadley
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 14:12:01 EDT)
• TeeShirtMan@Freshest.Net
  • saw you on evolution@calvin.edu: Re: Geocentrism and other issues (Sun Sep 10 2000 - 10:20:04 EDT)
• tempting.tearouts@mail.888.nu
  • ADV: ===>> FREE 1 yr. USA Magazine Sub sent worldwide-200+ Choices! Up to $81. (Fri Sep 15 2000 - 09:06:28 EDT)
• Troy Britain
  • RE: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Sat Sep 23 2000 - 23:21:37 EDT)
  • RE: Blood clotting and IC'ness? (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 16:08:24 EDT)
• Vernon Jenkins
  • Re: Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 18:44:44 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance? (was The "Apparent" Trap) (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 20:21:30 EDT)
  • Re: The "Apparent" Trap (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 20:12:08 EDT)
• Wesley R. Elsberry
  • Intelligent Agency by Proxy and TDI (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 13:59:26 EDT)
  • Dembski and Actual Specified Complexity (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 10:55:45 EDT)
  • CSI stuff (Thu Sep 28 2000 - 13:42:59 EDT)
  • Examples of natural selection as cause of events with CSI property (Fri Sep 22 2000 - 03:53:10 EDT)
  • Impedance matching (Thu Sep 21 2000 - 11:47:04 EDT)
  • Schutzenberger (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 22:47:44 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Tue Sep 19 2000 - 00:17:43 EDT)
  • URL problems and CSI (Mon Sep 18 2000 - 19:42:47 EDT)

Last message date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 22:33:12 EDT
Archived on: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 22:33:19 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 22:33:19 EDT