Re: ID vs. ?

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:05:10 EDT

  • Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Evolution of biological information"

    Bertvan:
    Hi Susan, Any "evidence" you cite is not yours. You are merely repeating
    someone else's "evidence". (Hopefully you completely understand it.)

    Meaningless squibbling over semantics.

    Bertvan: There
    are plenty of scientists skeptical that life arose accidentally from inert
    chemicals.

    Of course the term accidentally is perhaps poorly chosen as is 'inert
    chemicals'

    Bertvan: You can read their "evidence" if you wish. If you aren't convinc
    ed, I have no desire to persuade you otherwise.

    Too bad, generally science thrives in discussion. Perhaps that explains it.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 01:05:17 EDT