Re: Blood clotting and IC'ness?

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:11:01 EDT

  • Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Teleology"

    In a message dated 9/12/2000 8:28:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
    nalonso@megatribe.com writes:

    << Nelson:
    The clotting cascade requires TPA and it's activator among many other parts
    to function. None of the above addresses anything about the parts that make
    the clotting cascade irreducibly complex.
    >>

    Perhaps you could identify the parts of the blood clotting cascade that are
    essential parts and what parts are not? Before we spend our time and effort
    on showing what is not necessarily IC, we should perhaps focus on what
    exactly is claimed to be IC.

    Since pathways have been identified through which IC systems can arise
    naturally, do you still think that IC systems are a reliable detector of
    design?

    If you believe that IC is still a reliable detector of design, can you show
    how it can exclude a natural pathway as a designer?



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:11:24 EDT