Correction:
The paragraph that begins with "Also, virtually naturalistic evolutionists
are Platonistic/Rationalistic" in my previous post in this thread should
have begun: "Also, virtually *no* naturalistic evolutionists are
Platonistic/Rationalistic," as follows:
>Also, virtually *no* naturalistic evolutionists are
>Platonistic/Rationalistic enough to reify such a concept anyway; that's
>something that is *much* more prevalent among theists (particularly
>Christian theists). We know that it's a general term for the occurrence of
>a genome or gene or organism being excluded from further reproduction (or
>from reproducing as much as it might have otherwise). We don't think of it
>as some sort of "thing," like a rock, or even a *process* (though that is
>much closer). It's *any* event that, in context, prevents something from
>being reproduced.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 26 2000 - 09:19:22 EDT