> Although you seem determined to do battle
>against religion, more and more agnostics will be speaking out for a design
>inference.
Agnostic: One who believes that there can be no proof of the
existence of God but does not deny the possibility that God
exists. The American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd Ed.
Bertvan, does your definition of agnostic differ significantly
from this? If so, how? And why will "more and more" agnostics
be speaking out for a design inference? I don't understand
why you think a design inference is more attractive to agnostics
than the Darwinian model.
ralph
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 24 2000 - 02:11:54 EDT