Two observations. If one was to draw a Venn diagram of the possibilities
would not YEC be a sub-set of ID?
Second,
>Does not the search for extraterrestrial intelligence depend on the
>assumption that intelligently generated radio signals can be
distinguished
>from naturally generated ones? Closer to home, can one determine by
>studying Mount Rushmore that it was intelligently designed, or must one
rely
>solely on old news reports about its construction?
We have examples of intelligently generated and naturally generated radio
signals and have written computer programs which can analyze them. We
don't have example of intelligently generated and naturally generated and
computer programs to analyze them.
On the other hand, can a culture which dips slugs in paint, lets them
crawl across a canvass and calls the result "art" be trusted to indentify
intelligent design? Or consider the typical Mark Toby painting . . . .
billwald@juno.com
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 17 2000 - 23:45:41 EDT