Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?)

• Previous message: billwald@juno.com: "Re: fear of the religious implications of design"
• Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

FJ>But in the
>case of ID there are more problems than this, ID fails to show that
natural
>designers can be excluded.

It is the general nature of things that nothing can be excluded - the
problem of proving negatives.

All three proposals can be simultaneously correct. Some of the life
existing on earth at this time could have been planted by God, some could
have been planted by space aliens, and some could have sprung from
non-life.

It could be that in this universe as we find it only DNA- carbon based
life is possible. but neither can this be proven.

billwald@juno.com
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

• Next message: Ivar Ylvisaker: "Re: fear of the religious implications of design"
• Previous message: billwald@juno.com: "Re: fear of the religious implications of design"
• Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 2/2 (was ID vs. ?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 17 2000 - 23:45:51 EDT