Great posts

From: Bertvan@aol.com
Date: Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:05:57 EDT

  • Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: it's obvious where the ID movement wants to take it 1/2 (was ID vs. ?)"

    Hi Steve,
    You did yourself proud. Great posts.

    Bertvan
    http://members.aol.com/bertvan

    Steve:
    ID is probably of no "value" to die-hard philosophical materialists, but
    fortunately most people's minds are not bound by that particular metaphysical
    strait-jacket.

    >SJ>>But then what is he arguing against ID for?

    FJ>TO show that it is full of holes.

    But if FJ thinks that ID is "unimportant", why does he bother to "show
    that it is full of holes"?

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 17 2000 - 20:06:13 EDT