Biotic message

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Sat Sep 16 2000 - 21:07:05 EDT

Next message: Brian D Harper: "Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1"

Previous message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Peppered moth again?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 9/16/2000 5:28:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
sejones@iinet.net.au writes:

<< These contrivances are in the words of former Reflectorite
Walter ReMine "a biotic message" which "resists naturalistic explanation"
(ReMine W.J., "The Biotic Message," 1993, p.206)
>>

Does it resist naturalistic explanations and did Remine make a convincing
case for this assertion? For those interested, a review of Remine can be
found starting at the following links:

James Acker is starting his review of Remine.
http://x56.deja.com/threadmsg_if.xp?thitnum=6&AN=666098018.1
http://x51.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=666179358

Another interesting page addressing some of the quotes by Ted Holden from
Remine's book can be found at

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/teds_intermed.html

Next message: Brian D Harper: "Re: Schutzenberger's Folly, part 1"
Previous message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Peppered moth again?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 16 2000 - 21:07:25 EDT