>
>Ralph:
> >I see. I'm beginning to doubt my ability to interpret what people are
>saying.
> >Earlier you said:
>
> >> I believe nature is the
> >>result of intelligence and not the result of a series of chance
>events.
>
> >Now you say:
>
> >I sure didn't mean to give the impression I'd settled on "any
>particular
> >interpretation of the facts of evolution".
>
> >"I believe" sounded to me like someone who's made up their mind.
>
>Hi Ralph,
>Sorry for the confusion. I was not clear. Yes, I have pretty much made up my
>mind that evolution was not the result of chance. Design and intelligence
>were involved. The details of the design - how it was implemented - that I
>regard as a mystery. The historical facts, what actually happened, might be
>eventually better understood than at present.
>
>Bertvan
Thanks for clearing that up. I see nothing to debate in "I believe"
statements.
ralph
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 25 2000 - 16:23:26 EDT