FMAJ1019@aol.com wrote:
>ccogan@telepath.com writes:
><< At 12:59 AM 09/16/2000, you wrote:
>>http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/creation/evolve_irreducible.html
>>
>>Scenario #1: reduction of function
>>Scenario #2: loss of scaffolding
>>Scenario #3: duplication
>I would add:
>Scenario #4: "sideways" evolution from some other equally complex, but not
>*irreducibly* complex, structure.
#3, duplication, is all you need to generate masses of parts. Arrays of parts
evolve specialized morphology via loss and distortion of parts through RM&NS.
Unneeded parts--"scaffolding"--can disappear. What am I missing? Don't tell
me IC advocates are unaware that this is part of evolutionary theory.
--Cliff Lundberg ~ San Francisco ~ 415-648-0208 ~ cliff@cab.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 16 2000 - 22:33:45 EDT