In a message dated 9/13/2000 3:38:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
sejones@iinet.net.au writes:
<< I have four things to say to this:
1. Dawkins does commit Darwinism to gradualism and so IC is a potential
falsification of Darwinism. >>
That is if it can be shown that no potential pathways to IC systems exist. So
far the evidence shows the contrary.
Those Darwinists who rule out IC must know in
<< their hearts that Darwinist is false, otherwise they would welcome IC
arguments knowing they *must* win if Darwinism is true;
>>
Shame on you for this unfounded accusation. You are attributing motives to
people you do not know. As a scientist and Christian this truely offends me.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:29:14 EDT