At 04:34 PM 09/16/2000, you wrote:
>FMAJ1019@aol.com wrote:
>
> >ccogan@telepath.com writes:
> ><< At 12:59 AM 09/16/2000, you wrote:
> >>http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/creation/evolve_irreducible.html
> >>
> >>Scenario #1: reduction of function
> >>Scenario #2: loss of scaffolding
> >>Scenario #3: duplication
>
> >I would add:
> >Scenario #4: "sideways" evolution from some other equally complex, but not
> >*irreducibly* complex, structure.
>
>#3, duplication, is all you need to generate masses of parts. Arrays of parts
>evolve specialized morphology via loss and distortion of parts through RM&NS.
>Unneeded parts--"scaffolding"--can disappear. What am I missing? Don't tell
>me IC advocates are unaware that this is part of evolutionary theory.
Chris
I think so. By the way, I liked you piece on segmentation, and I think you
are basically right. Good work.
>--
>Cliff Lundberg ~ San Francisco ~ 415-648-0208 ~ cliff@cab.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 16 2000 - 23:50:59 EDT