In a message dated 9/18/2000 9:46:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nalonso@megatribe.com writes:
<< http://inia.cls.org/~welsberr/zgists/wre/papers/antiec.html
Nelson:
This is a computation, nothing here is mentioned nor pointed out in nature
that can produce CSI, this also requires forethought and algorithms.Nothing
in nature is held up as "exhibit A".
>>
See Wesley's response to why it is important to show that algorithms can
create CSI.
" Also, we can point out that Dembski considers natural selection to simply
be an element ofthe set of evolutionary algorithms (<http://inia.cls.org/~wels
berr/ae/dembski_wa/19990913_explaining_csi.html>).
"
So if algorithms can be shown to create CSI then Dembski has a problem. I
understand that Dembski has been working on addressing this issue. So far it
seems quite clear that it is hard to differentiate between CSI and apparant
CSI. Wesley provided us with another one of his brilliant arguments when he
proposed the
"algorithm room".
http://www.deja.com/=dnc/getdoc.xp?AN=532248147
Also see http://inia.cls.org/~welsberr/ae/dembski_wa.html for more excellent
articles.
It would be interesting to hear Dembski respond to these arguments.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 18 2000 - 23:55:55 EDT