In a message dated 9/12/2000 12:53:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
nalonso@megatribe.com writes:
<< Nelson:
Atoms may or may not be IC, however, you missed the entire point of my post.
Atoms are not selected for, do not replicate themselves, do not undergo
mutations,etc. IC is a biological concept, and it describes molecular
machines. Apply the concept of IC to atoms is likeing applying Darwinian
natural selection to rocks.
>>
Cool so the mouse trap is not IC either? I am amazed how quickly you seem to
be abandoning Behe's arguments.
Quite enlightening but it seems you have found another major problem with
Behe's thesis.
So this means that you cannot use evidence of design of non biological
systems as evidence of design of biological systems. It gets worse, since we
know that non-biological and biological IC systems could arise naturally, it
becomes even harder to support the IC hypothesis.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:26:10 EDT