Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any!

• Previous message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Definitions of ID"
• Next in thread: Cliff Hamrick: "Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Dear SJ

>When I said I "have *never* yet had a reply", I mean to the actual
>question: "What do you, an evolutionist, consider the most telling
points
>against evolution?"

This is two questions: . . . against evolution, the lab science and
against evolution as historical speculation.

As far as I know (as a non-scientist), there are no telling points
against evolution, the lab science.

On the other hand, there are "telling points" against evolution as
historical speculation as there are against other historical seculations
. . . Was Jesus the Mesiah, was Jefferson a Christian, which Europeans
first "discovered" America? Was there an island or continant of Atlantis?
 Were there black Africans who flew around the Pyramids and were they
shot down by European skeet shooters? <G>

billwald@juno.com

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

• Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: Definitions of ID"
• Previous message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Definitions of ID"
• Next in thread: Cliff Hamrick: "Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 04 2000 - 17:11:36 EDT