In a message dated 9/14/2000 11:31:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nalonso@megatribe.com writes:
<< Nelson:
I would further predict that the flagellum actually requires more parts then
Behe thinks for minimal function. That it is much more complex then we
think, furthering the evidence for design.
>>
I thought that complexity and design were unrelated? Is the argument now that
some IC systems could be 'designed' naturally but that the more complex ones
are not? How can increased complexity suddenly be a furthering indicator of
design?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:18:20 EDT