In a message dated 9/27/2000 6:35:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
ccogan@telepath.com writes:
> Chris
> I agree. If we assume that a supernatural creator could exist, then the
> further assumption that it *does* exist and created the Universe does not
> fundamentally affect science, which still has to go about its business
> naturalistically (i.e., via empirical observation, empirical testability,
> etc.) and leave out any questions as to *ultimate* origin of things.
>
Very well said and this shows that while science operates only in the natural
realm, science is not necessarily anti-God. Johnson got it wrong there.
Lamoureux and others did a great job at unraveling Johnson's arguments.
Not only is science not anti-God but religious faith and science can co-exist
quite happily, each in its own realm.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 27 2000 - 12:04:00 EDT