In a message dated 9/26/2000 6:24:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
hvantill@novagate.com writes:
<< The arguments re ID continue, with little hope for significant progress.
One
of the chief reasons, I would suggest, is that there is no common
understanding of what it means "to be (intelligently) designed." For this
state of affairs I hold the most vocal proponents of ID responsible
(Johnson, Dembski, Behe, Nelson, Meyer, Wells, et al.).
>>
If I remember correctly, van Till made these statements in Lamoureux and
Johnson's book "Darwinism defeated?". I have just finished reading this book
and am impressed by Denis and other's arguments. I would be interested how
van Till feels about the book, his contributions and the contributions of
others?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 26 2000 - 12:22:18 EDT