>Ralph,
>Hi Bertvan. Judging from your previous posts I would assume that if you
>had been around during this time, you would have been arguing for
>*no* teleology assumptions, since teleology was the dominant scientific
>view being forced on all the kids in school? Ain't life strange? :)
Bertvan:
I probably would have. I argue that design should be accepted as a
legitimate difference of opinion. I have no quarrel with Freudianism, now
that it is not being prescribed by the medical profession a "scientific
treatment".
Bertvan
http://members.aol.com/bertvan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 12 2000 - 14:15:58 EDT