Reflectorites
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:04:58 EDT, FMAJ1019@aol.com wrote:
FJ>I am looking
>forward to any attempt by IDers to address my arguments. ...
They don't need to. FJ/Pim concedes ID's point that there is detectable
evidence of design in biological nature.
His disagreement is over the nature of the designer, i.e. the designer is
`intelligent natural forces' (whatever they are), which is outside the
scope of ID.
FJ/Pim's `intelligent natural forces' have the added advantage in that they
would destroy Darwinian explanations ("it wasn't random mutation and
natural selection, Prof. Dawkins, but `intelligent natural forces'"), so I
personally wish to encourage him in his search for these elusive (or should I
say virtual?) entities.
May I suggest to FJ/Pim that he might watch re-runs of Sesame Street
for vital clues as to how to become aware of these `intelligent natural
forces'? :-)
Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen E. (Steve) Jones ,--_|\ Email: sejones@iinet.net.au
3 Hawker Avenue / Oz \ Web: http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
Warwick 6024 -> *_,--\_/ Phone: +61 8 9448 7439
Perth, Western Australia v "Test everything." (1 Thess. 5:21)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 20 2000 - 18:51:12 EDT