In a message dated 9/13/2000 8:25:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nalonso@megatribe.com writes:
<< Bertvan:
>We heard you FMAJ. You don't find ID a useful concept. (It would be nice
if
>you didn't keep repeating that over and over.)
and so now he should shut up and stop shredding ID with logic and evidence?
Nelson:
The problem is he is just asserting it, he isn't even using any arguments.
If he wants to assert that it isn't useful then fine, if he wants to
demonstrate it, he's going to have to respond to my postings.
>>
I have responded to your postings and if you consider the response 'not using
any arguments' then you really are desperate.
<< >Other people are finding it
>useful
Politically useful.
Nelson:
I see you learning the art of handwaving yourself.
>>
Not really. There are also people who find it theologically useful and some
that even claim it is scientifically useful. I am addressing the latter one
by showing that ID has a myriad of problems.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:43:58 EDT