Ccogan: One of the reasons for the fundamental failure of ID theory is
that it has no solid and non_arbitrary concept of design.
Indeed, Bertvan seems to think that ID is in opposition to Darwinism but ID
cannot exclude Darwinism. It seems that equivocation is working in this area.
Design is poorly defined and inferences to design are extrapolated to
evidence of a Designer who could for all we know be merely a 'designer'
(natural force).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 16:33:34 EDT