Re: We heard you

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:33 EDT

Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID"

Previous message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: prima facie design hypothesis"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "We heard you"
Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: We heard you"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 9/13/2000 8:50:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nalonso@megatribe.com writes:

<< FMA:
I have responded to your postings and if you consider the response 'not
using
any arguments' then you really are desperate.

Nelson:
Ok, lets have a look >>

Enjoy

Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: Flagellum Re: Definitions of ID"
Previous message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: prima facie design hypothesis"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "We heard you"
Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: We heard you"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 01:26:45 EDT