Wells is a charlatan. An 'embryologist' that cannot accurately describve
basic structures in an embryo. Why doesn't the little biosketch of him list
his first degree in theology? Why doesn't it say that he is a follower of
the Rev. Moon?
Does it mention thatthis amazing researcher has only 3 publications to his
name?
NONE of them dealing with evolution?
That his slanderous charges about the peppered moths are ridiculous? That
most biology texts that include Haeckels drawings - if at all - mention them
only in an historical light?
Does Wells point out that HIS postion has NO evidence for it at all except
for philosophical mumbo-jumbo and incredulity?
Of course not. It sickens me that this anti-scientist continues to get
press....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:11:30 EDT