Evolution - September 1999 by date

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Wed 01 Sep 1999 - 10:51:06 EDT
Ending: Thu 30 Sep 1999 - 22:24:50 EDT
Messages: 549

Neanderthal cannibalism mortongr@flash.net
Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read mortongr@flash.net
This is design, yet it uses chance. Bertvan@aol.com
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Stephen E. Jones
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Stephen E. Jones
Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Spetner's book) Stephen E. Jones
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin mortongr@flash.net
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Steve Clark
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Steve Clark
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Brian D Harper
The power of evolutionary theory Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: After the big bang Stephen E. Jones
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Susan Brassfield
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Everyone Is Born with a Head for Numbers Pim van Meurs
RE: Human/chimp similarity measures Pim van Meurs
RE: Inherit an Ill Wind Pim van Meurs
RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Pim van Meurs
Re: Inherit an Ill Wind Susan B
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Susan B
Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read grmorton@argolink.net
Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read grmorton@argolink.net
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin grmorton@argolink.net
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Steve Clark
RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin John E. Rylander
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Cliff Lundberg
Human/chimp similarity measures Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Howard J. Van Till
teaching evolution in Wisconsin Steve Clark
Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Gary Collins
Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Stephen E. Jones
Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Stephen E. Jones
Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Spetner's book) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Vertebrate evolution Cliff Lundberg
Re: Vertebrate evolution mortongr@flash.net
RE: Inherit an Ill Wind Pim van Meurs
Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise James Mahaffy
Re: Vertebrate evolution Cliff Lundberg
Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Cliff Lundberg
Re: ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Brian D Harper
The First Americans mortongr@flash.net
Vertebrate evolution mortongr@flash.net
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) MikeBGene@aol.com
Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity" Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: philosophy of discovery MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Inherit an Ill Wind Stephen E. Jones
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Stephen E. Jones
Re: Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity" Stephen E. Jones
Re: philosophy of discovery Chris Cogan
RE: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) mortongr@flash.net
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science mortongr@flash.net
RE: I've also read Spetner's book John E. Rylander
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Tim Ikeda
I've also read Spetner's book Bertvan@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: philosophy of discovery Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: philosophy of discovery Susan Brassfield
Re: ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Wesley R. Elsberry
ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Rationalism (was: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to crea David J. Tyler
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science David J. Tyler
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Chris Cogan
Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Pim van Meurs
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons MikeBGene@aol.com
The Human Face of Science MikeBGene@aol.com
RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Pim van Meurs
RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Pim van Meurs
RE: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Pim van Meurs
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
A more readable table for noise post James Mahaffy
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Stephen E. Jones
Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Stephen E. Jones
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Stephen E. Jones
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Stephen E. Jones
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science MikeBGene@aol.com
philosophy of discovery Cliff Lundberg
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry Brian D Harper
RE: TE,souls, and freedom Brian D Harper
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
Relevant literature distribution and Johnson - some numbers Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists David J. Tyler
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Susan Brassfield
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Inside/Outside Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Inside/Outside Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Inside/Outside Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: Phil Johnson's review of Pennock's `Tower of Babel' Pim van Meurs
Stephen confused? RE: Phil Johnson's review of Pennock's `Tower of Babel' Pim van Meurs
RE: Everyone Is Born with a Head for Numbers Pim van Meurs
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Evolution and ASA lists and noise James Mahaffy
Re: Inside/Outside MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Biochmborg@aol.com
Inside/Outside Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Everyone Is Born with a Head for Numbers Stephen E. Jones
Re: Phil Johnson's review of Pennock's `Tower of Babel' Stephen E. Jones
RE: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... John E. Rylander
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... John E. Rylander
Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Biochmborg@aol.com
Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science MikeBGene@aol.com
RE: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... John E. Rylander
RE: Experts Worry Troy Britain
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Experts Worry Susan B
Johnson as AIDS expert... Tim Ikeda
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Howard J. Van Till
RE: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) John E. Rylander
Experts Worry Bertvan@aol.com
Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Arthur V. Chadwick
just for Bertvan Susan Brassfield
Re: Experts Worry Susan Brassfield
RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Arthur V. Chadwick
Experts Worry Bertvan@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Susan Brassfield
Re: Experts Worry Susan Brassfield
Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Howard J. Van Till
Experts Worry Bertvan@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Pim van Meurs
Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity" Wesley R. Elsberry
RE: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Pim van Meurs
RE: I do like to play devil's advocate (was Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity") Pim van Meurs
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Wesley R. Elsberry
Experts Worry Bertvan@aol.com
FW: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science MccarrickAD@nswccd.navy.mil
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry... Cliff Lundberg
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" William A. Dembski
RE: TE,souls, and freedom John E. Rylander
Re: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Tim Ikeda
Re: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Stephen E. Jones
Re: I do like to play devil's advocate (was Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity") Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE, souls and freedom Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE, souls and freedom and a complaint Stephen E. Jones
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Stephen E. Jones
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Cliff Lundberg
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: TE,souls, and freedom Brian D Harper
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists David J. Tyler
Re: Death before the Fall (part 2) Mark Phillips
Re: Death before the Fall (part 1) Mark Phillips
Re: TE, souls and freedom Chris Cogan
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book MikeBGene@aol.com
RE: TE, souls and freedom John E. Rylander
RE: Plumbing new depths (was What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC") Pim van Meurs
RE: Plumbing new depths (was What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC") Pim van Meurs
IC can be explained by Darwinian mechanisms. Pim van Meurs
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
RE: TE, souls and freedom Pim van Meurs
RE: Plumbing new depths (was What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC") Stephen E. Jones
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... (was A Stephen E. Jones
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Stephen E. Jones
Re: Scientists make molecular motor Stephen E. Jones
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
Re: The "rock" of faith MikeBGene@aol.com
RE: The "rock" of faith John E. Rylander
Re: The "rock" of faith Biochmborg@aol.com
The "rock" of faith Chris Cogan
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" John E. Rylander
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Susan B
Re: TE, souls and freedom Brian D Harper
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Tim Ikeda
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Cliff Lundberg
RE: TE,souls, and freedom John E. Rylander
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" John E. Rylander
Re: TE, souls, and freedom MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
RE: TE, souls, and freedom John E. Rylander
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Jason
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Cliff Lundberg
Editorial by Sobran Bertvan@aol.com
Re: Editorial by Sobran Chris Cogan
last post Chris Cogan
TE, souls, and freedom Bertvan@aol.com
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: TE, souls and freedom Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: Spetner and Shannon Pim van Meurs
RE: I've also read Spetner's book Pim van Meurs
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists David J. Tyler
RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Pim van Meurs
RE: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Pim van Meurs
RE: Spetner and Shannon Pim van Meurs
RE: TE, souls and freedom Pim van Meurs
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Cliff Lundberg
Test Mark Phillips
Re: I've also read Spetner's book MikeBGene@aol.com
Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism John E. Rylander
Re: Understanding ES Chris Cogan
TE, souls and freedom Bertvan@aol.com
Re: TE,souls, and freedom Brian D Harper
I've also read Spetner's book Bertvan@aol.com
Re: TE, souls and freedom and a complaint andrew
Re: My thanks to Bertvan for his encouragment! (was Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it ...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE, souls and freedom Stephen E. Jones
Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) David Bowman
Re: Editorial by Sobran MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Spetner and Shannon Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Philosophy of Science texts Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Editorial by Sobran Susan Brassfield
Spetner and Shannon Wesley R. Elsberry
Philosophy of Science texts Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Hardy-Castle-Weinberg equilibrium Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Hardy-Castle-Weinberg equilibrium Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Spetner and Shannon mortongr@flash.net
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
Re: Spetner and Shannon Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" MikeBGene@aol.com
Spetner and Shannon Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Susan Brassfield
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... (was A Jonathan Clarke
Information increase Chris Cogan
Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Bill Payne
RE: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Donald Frack
Hardy-Castle-Weinberg equilibrium Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: I've also read Spetner's book mortongr@flash.net
RE: Editorial by Sobran mortongr@flash.net
Re: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Biochmborg@aol.com
Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Bertvan@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Pim Van Meurs
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Susan B
Re: Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Pim Van Meurs
Re: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Stephen E. Jones
Re: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Stephen E. Jones
Re: Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Stephen E. Jones
Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... (was A Catholic sermon from Kansas) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Cliff Lundberg
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Chris Cogan
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Editorial by Sobran Pim van Meurs
Editorial by Sobran Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: I've also read Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: TE, Souls, and freedom andrew
Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) David Bowman
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists David J. Tyler
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Chris Cogan
RE: I've also read Spetner's book Donald Frack
RE: Lee Spetner's book Pim van Meurs
RE: Belief in God Pim van Meurs
RE: TE, souls and freedom Pim van Meurs
Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Cliff Lundberg
Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Bill Payne
Re: TE, Souls, and freedom Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book Tim Ikeda
Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) mortongr@flash.net
TE,souls, and essential essence Susan B
Re: TE,Souls, and freedom MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: I've also read Spetner's book MikeBGene@aol.com
I've also read Spetner's book Tim Ikeda
Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) David Bowman
Dembski's "reiterations" post: Explaining Specified Complexity Wesley R. Elsberry
Re:TE,Souls, and freedom andrew
Re: TE,souls, and freedom Loren Haarsma
Bruce Alberts' Opinion Piece MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: TE, souls and freedom Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Lee Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: TE, souls and freedom MikeBGene@aol.com
Re: Lee Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
Belief in God Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Lee Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: TE, souls and freedom Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: TE, souls, and freedom Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Lee Spetner's book David Bowman
Re: Lee Spetner's book Biochmborg@aol.com
TE, souls and freedom Bertvan@aol.com
RE: Lee Spetner's book Pim van Meurs
RE: TE, souls, and freedom John E. Rylander
RE: TE,souls, and freedom John E. Rylander
Re: TE, souls, and freedom Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: TE,souls, and freedom David J. Tyler
TE,souls, and freedom andrew
RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott John E. Rylander
Re: Lee Spetner's book Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Pim van Meurs
RE: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Pim van Meurs
RE: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it ...) Pim van Meurs
RE: 90% Pim van Meurs
RE: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Pim van Meurs
RE: New theory: Gamma-ray blast spawned planets Pim van Meurs
Re: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Bill Payne
RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott John E. Rylander
RE: 90% John E. Rylander
Re: Lee Spetner's book Tim Ikeda
Fish and the flood mortongr@flash.net
RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott mortongr@flash.net
Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists mortongr@flash.net
(no subject) Jose Mendez
Re: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to mortongr@flash.net
Lee Spetner's book andrew
Re: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Susan B
Re: 90% darren.coltman@zurichus.com
Re: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it ...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: 90% Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Stephen E. Jones
Re: New theory: Gamma-ray blast spawned planets Stephen E. Jones
Gallup Poll Sample Kendra
RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Gallup Poll Release, 8-30-99 darren.coltman@zurichus.com
Re: Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Pim van Meurs
Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists David J. Tyler
Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman Bill Payne
Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Bill Payne
Gallup Poll Release, 8-30-99 Kendra
RE: Evolution of improved fitness Pim van Meurs
"little joker" Kendra
RE: Evolution of improved fitness Hofmann, Jim
Harmful mutations Pim van Meurs
RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Pim van Meurs
RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Pim van Meurs
RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery Susan B
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas mortongr@flash.net
Interesting resource Pim van Meurs
What's left of IC? Pim van Meurs
Re: Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Biochmborg@aol.com
=?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_Subj=3A=09_What_I_Truly_Believe_Regarding?= Pim van Meurs
Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Bertvan@aol.com
RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Pim van Meurs
RE: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Pim van Meurs
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Biochmborg@aol.com
What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Biochmborg@aol.com
RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Pim van Meurs
RE: A little laugh re KS and AZ? Pim van Meurs
RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Pim van Meurs
Re: A little laugh re KS and AZ? Stephen E. Jones
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Stephen E. Jones
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Stephen E. Jones
RE: Fine tuning argument once again... Pim van Meurs
Re: Fine tuning argument once again... andrew
Re: Designer bugs (Was: "A blueprint for...) mortongr@flash.net
Designer bugs (Was: "A blueprint for...) Tim Ikeda
Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman David Bowman
Evolution of improved fitness Pim van Meurs
RE: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Pim van Meurs
Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Pim van Meurs
A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry. Pim van Meurs
RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Pim van Meurs
"A blueprint for the creation of life is about to be unveiled by scientists. " John E. Rylander
RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery Susan B
The Kansas Battle from Reuters Susan B
RE: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything Pim van Meurs
RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Pim van Meurs
RE: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen) Pim van Meurs
RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Pim van Meurs
Fine tuning argument once again... Pim van Meurs
RE: 90% Pim van Meurs
RE: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen) Pim van Meurs
Re: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery Susan B
Re: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything (was Susan B
Re: 90% Susan B
Re: A little laugh re KS and AZ? Susan B
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation mortongr@flash.net
Re: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it mortongr@flash.net
Re: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Black hole detected swallowing matter Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: 90% Stephen E. Jones
Re: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything (was Where the information comes from) Stephen E. Jones
Re: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Biochmborg@aol.com
A little laugh re KS and AZ? Hapi Daiz
Re: Death before the Fall Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Brian D Harper
Test; Please Disregard Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Peppered moths...again??? David J. Tyler
Re: Peppered moths...again??? David J. Tyler
need web page address R. Joel Duff
RE: Peppered moths...again??? Troy Britain
RE: Peppered moths...again??? Pim van Meurs
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) efoster@lib.drury.edu
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Jeff Stratford
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Marcio Pie
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Peppered moths...again??? David J. Tyler
Re: Peppered moths...again??? Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Pim van Meurs
RE: [breakpoint] Is the Sky Falling?, 9/1/99 Pim van Meurs
RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Pim van Meurs
Peppered moths...again??? Troy Britain
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Loren Haarsma
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Stephen E. Jones
Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Stephen E. Jones
Fwd: [breakpoint] Is the Sky Falling?, 9/1/99 Stephen E. Jones
RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Donald Frack
RE: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's darren.coltman@zurichus.com
More of the same from Stephen SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
RE: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' Pim van Meurs
RE: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' Pim van Meurs
RE: Reply to Bruce Alberts Pim van Meurs
RE: 90% Pim van Meurs
Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's Marcio Pie
Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's Marcio Pie
Re: Reply to Bruce Alberts Susan B
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation mortongr@flash.net
Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Susan B
Reply to Bruce Alberts Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Arthur V. Chadwick
do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's so-called Marcio Pie
Re: Where the information comes from. Loren Haarsma
Re: Where the information comes from. Loren Haarsma
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: 90% Arthur V. Chadwick
90% Hapi Daiz
Re: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights darren.coltman@zurichus.com
RE: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Pim van Meurs
RE: Bill Dembski hits the jackpot! Pim van Meurs
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Steve Clark
Re: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Stephen E. Jones
Re: Where the information comes from. Stephen E. Jones
Re: Bill Dembski hits the jackpot! Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Stephen E. Jones
H. erectus with sapiens traits mortongr@flash.net
RE: Chimps don't talk, but they do cry Pim van Meurs
RE: SURVIVAL OF THE FADDIST Pim van Meurs
RE: Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Pim van Meurs
RE: Wall Street Journal: The Church of Darwin By Phillip E. Johnson Pim van Meurs
RE: Wall Street Journal: The Church of Darwin By Phillip E. Johnson Pim van Meurs
RE: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Pim van Meurs
RE: the Kansas state science standards (was Darkness spreads over Kansas) Pim van Meurs
RE: transitions from a wolf-like creature to a whale? (was Rabbits in the Precambrian) Pim van Meurs
RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Pim van Meurs
RE: Where the information comes from. Pim van Meurs
RE: This is bizarre Pim van Meurs
RE: This is bizarre Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Pim van Meurs
RE: Intelligent design vs. evolution Pim van Meurs
RE: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Pim van Meurs
RE: The science educators' Vietnam Pim van Meurs
RE: This is bizarre Pim van Meurs
RE: This is bizarre Pim van Meurs
RE: This is bizarre Pim van Meurs
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Chris Cogan
Going the other way... Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) efoster@lib.drury.edu
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science Cliff Lundberg
A wager about biology in the year 2059 Tim Ikeda
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Intelligent design vs. evolution Stephen E. Jones
Kansas & Evolution Susan B
Roots of the coal-swamp Lycopods, Stigmaria. James Mahaffy
Re: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Wesley R. Elsberry
Re: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Arthur V. Chadwick
Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Wesley R. Elsberry
E-Commerce Administrator
origins of the eye R. Joel Duff
Re: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Biochmborg@aol.com
Re: Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
Re: Year of Destiny?! Susan Brassfield
Re: Year of Destiny?! darren.coltman@zurichus.com
Re: Year of Destiny?! Susan Brassfield
Re: Coal (Was the saddest statement) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Where the information comes from. Loren Haarsma
A formula to predict evolution? efoster@lib.drury.edu
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation mortongr@flash.net
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Where the information comes from. Stephen E. Jones
Re: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Stephen E. Jones
Re: TE/EC ad hominem against Johnson (was re-whales from rodents) Stephen E. Jones
Re: Phillip E. Johnson complete web links Stephen E. Jones
Popper Recants Brian D Harper
Re: Popper's recantation Susan Brassfield
Re: Popper's recantation Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: This is bizarre Bill Payne
Materialistic Science Hapi Daiz
Re: This is bizarre Susan Brassfield
Popper's recantation Susan Brassfield
Re: Materialistic Science darren.coltman@zurichus.com
Re: Materialistic Science Jeff Stratford
Re: The science educators' Vietnam efoster@lib.drury.edu
Re: Materialistic Science Jeff Stratford
Re: Materialistic Science Jeff Stratford
Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Steve Clark

Last message date: Thu 30 Sep 1999 - 22:24:50 EDT
Archived on: Thu Sep 30 1999 - 22:24:59 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.