RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Sat, 11 Sep 1999 11:31:47 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pim van Meurs: "A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry."
Previous message: John E. Rylander: ""A blueprint for the creation of life is about to be unveiled by scientists. ""

>SJ: It highlights Phil Johnson's observation that for Darwinists "evidence
is not
>really necessary". The problem is already solved in the definitions:

Pim:
>Well, dear Phil hardly should be taken to seriously.
>So Stephen, why are you ignoring the reality that science has learned lots
about abiogenesis?

Susan: for the same reason that Phillip Johnson ignores it: because it serves the
purpose.

But that destroys any opportunity for a scientific discussion then?

Next message: Pim van Meurs: "A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry."
Previous message: John E. Rylander: ""A blueprint for the creation of life is about to be unveiled by scientists. ""