Evolution - September 1999 by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Wed 01 Sep 1999 - 10:51:06 EDT
Ending: Thu 30 Sep 1999 - 22:24:50 EDT
Messages: 549

• Administrator
  • E-Commerce Fri, 3 Sep 1999 21:56:03 -0700
• andrew
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom and a complaint Fri, 17 Sep 1999 07:01:35 -0500
  • Re: TE, Souls, and freedom Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:03:35 -0500
  • Re:TE,Souls, and freedom Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:57:26 -0500
  • TE,souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 20:18:11 -0500
  • Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:48:37 -0500
  • Re: Fine tuning argument once again... Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:25:45 -0500
• Arthur V. Chadwick
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:57:04 -0700
  • The power of evolutionary theory Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:09:45 -0700
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Tue, 28 Sep 1999 07:15:34 -0700
  • Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:29:54 -0700
  • ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:58:31 -0700
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:00:14 -0700
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 22:00:13 -0700
  • RE: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 21:55:38 -0700
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:02:53 -0700
  • RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 14:46:20 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:57:33 -0700
  • Re: Spetner and Shannon Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:34:56 -0700
  • Re: Philosophy of Science texts Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:31:36 -0700
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:22:14 -0700
  • Re: Hardy-Castle-Weinberg equilibrium Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:51:38 -0700
  • Re: Spetner and Shannon Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:24:30 -0700
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:14:04 -0700
  • Re: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:25:42 -0700
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:53:31 -0700
  • Re: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:45:01 -0700
  • Editorial by Sobran Wed, 15 Sep 1999 09:45:30 -0700
  • RE: I've also read Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:57:47 -0700
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:34:39 -0700
  • Belief in God Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:07:26 -0700
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:25:10 -0700
  • RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:22:51 -0700
  • Re: Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:50:13 -0700
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:38:16 -0700
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 09 Sep 1999 07:07:25 -0700
  • Reply to Bruce Alberts Tue, 07 Sep 1999 17:49:25 -0700
  • Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 17:36:01 -0700
  • Re: 90% Tue, 07 Sep 1999 10:39:02 -0700
  • RE: This is bizarre Mon, 06 Sep 1999 15:01:52 -0700
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science Mon, 06 Sep 1999 14:11:09 -0700
  • Re: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Sat, 04 Sep 1999 07:49:05 -0700
  • Re: Coal (Was the saddest statement) Fri, 03 Sep 1999 07:35:46 -0700
  • Re: Popper's recantation Thu, 02 Sep 1999 07:30:43 -0700
• Bertvan@aol.com
  • This is design, yet it uses chance. Thu, 30 Sep 1999 19:53:59 EDT
  • I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:46:53 EDT
  • Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:26:42 EDT
  • Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 15:45:19 EDT
  • Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:23:59 EDT
  • Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 11:26:16 EDT
  • Editorial by Sobran Sat, 18 Sep 1999 14:24:40 EDT
  • TE, souls, and freedom Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:53:54 EDT
  • TE, souls and freedom Thu, 16 Sep 1999 22:46:30 EDT
  • I've also read Spetner's book Thu, 16 Sep 1999 20:21:54 EDT
  • Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:53:00 EDT
  • TE, souls and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:14:50 EDT
  • Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Sun, 12 Sep 1999 16:45:29 EDT
• Bill Payne
  • Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:08:40 -0600
  • Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:18:46 -0600
  • Re: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:04:18 -0600
  • Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:09:36 -0600
  • Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 06:36:04 -0600
  • Re: This is bizarre Wed, 1 Sep 1999 22:44:53 -0600
• Biochmborg@aol.com
  • Re: philosophy of discovery Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:45:25 EDT
  • Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:18:30 EDT
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Thu, 23 Sep 1999 23:57:21 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 23:33:14 EDT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:02:05 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:20:24 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:24:19 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:11:01 EDT
  • Re: Inside/Outside Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:12:24 EDT
  • Re: Inside/Outside Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:36:39 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:19:40 EDT
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 12:19:11 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:20:12 EDT
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:07:07 EDT
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:57:44 EDT
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:57:54 EDT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:57:28 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:30:37 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:39:53 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:19:33 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 20 Sep 1999 12:16:16 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Mon, 20 Sep 1999 00:49:35 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 16:52:27 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Sun, 19 Sep 1999 16:39:46 EDT
  • Re: The "rock" of faith Sun, 19 Sep 1999 09:21:08 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:44:48 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:02:29 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:12:35 EDT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:12:03 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:12:26 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:12:10 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:11:54 EDT
  • Re: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:32:27 EDT
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:32:17 EDT
  • Re: TE, Souls, and freedom Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:06:17 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:41:58 EDT
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:39:07 EDT
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:23:10 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:10:53 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:10:44 EDT
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:43:47 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:49:05 EDT
  • Re: Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:09:46 EDT
  • Re: Subj: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:26:27 EDT
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Sun, 12 Sep 1999 14:56:50 EDT
  • What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Sun, 12 Sep 1999 14:57:00 EDT
  • Re: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything Sat, 11 Sep 1999 12:26:43 EDT
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Sat, 11 Sep 1999 03:08:33 EDT
  • Re: Death before the Fall Fri, 10 Sep 1999 18:05:38 EDT
  • Test; Please Disregard Fri, 10 Sep 1999 15:18:55 EDT
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 9 Sep 1999 13:16:41 EDT
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 9 Sep 1999 10:07:31 EDT
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:55:51 EDT
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was Tue, 7 Sep 1999 11:42:34 EDT
  • Re: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:43:56 EDT
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:38:50 -0700
  • Re: ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Sat, 25 Sep 1999 21:38:04 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:52:09 -0700
  • RE: TE,souls, and freedom Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:48:18 -0700
  • RE: TE,souls, and freedom Mon, 20 Sep 1999 12:00:03 -0700
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Sat, 18 Sep 1999 21:42:20 -0700
  • Re: TE,souls, and freedom Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:15:15 -0700
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:33:19 -0700
  • Popper Recants Thu, 02 Sep 1999 13:43:51 -0700
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: philosophy of discovery Fri, 24 Sep 1999 23:13:25 -0700
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Fri, 24 Sep 1999 01:14:55 -0700
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:55:55 -0700
  • The "rock" of faith Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:12:24 -0700
  • Re: Editorial by Sobran Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:41:21 -0700
  • last post Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:22:55 -0700
  • Re: Understanding ES Thu, 16 Sep 1999 20:36:10 -0700
  • Information increase Thu, 16 Sep 1999 00:36:15 -0700
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:57:10 -0700
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:29:52 -0700
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:30:49 -0700
• Cliff Lundberg
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:23:31 -0700
  • Re: Vertebrate evolution Mon, 27 Sep 1999 02:13:34 -0700
  • Re: Vertebrate evolution Sun, 26 Sep 1999 01:29:15 -0700
  • Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Sat, 25 Sep 1999 17:20:10 -0700
  • philosophy of discovery Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:38:07 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry... Tue, 21 Sep 1999 01:33:48 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 20 Sep 1999 13:17:26 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Sat, 18 Sep 1999 16:20:25 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:35:02 -0700
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:47:30 -0700
  • Re: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:16:32 -0700
  • Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:18:56 -0700
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science Sun, 05 Sep 1999 16:18:07 -0700
• darren.coltman@zurichus.com
  • Re: 90% Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:12:56 -0500
  • Re: Gallup Poll Release, 8-30-99 Mon, 13 Sep 1999 10:48:34 -0500
  • RE: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's Wed, 8 Sep 1999 12:07:28 -0500
  • Re: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:13:45 -0500
  • Re: Year of Destiny?! Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:14:21 -0500
  • Re: Materialistic Science Wed, 1 Sep 1999 14:03:40 -0500
• David Bowman
  • Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:45:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:17:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:28:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:59:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:23:20 -0400 (EDT)
• David J. Tyler
  • Re: Rationalism (was: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to crea Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:08:16 GMT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:18:43 GMT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Thu, 23 Sep 1999 16:44:41 GMT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Mon, 20 Sep 1999 15:03:22 GMT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:23:17 GMT
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:57:58 GMT
  • Re: TE,souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:33:23 GMT
  • Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:28:45 GMT
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:08:37 GMT
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:57:47 GMT
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 9 Sep 1999 13:47:42 GMT
• Donald Frack
  • RE: Art's review, Lee Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:20:30 -0700
  • RE: I've also read Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:32:12 -0700
  • RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Wed, 8 Sep 1999 14:47:11 -0700
• efoster@lib.drury.edu
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Thu, 09 Sep 1999 18:18:11 -0500
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Sun, 05 Sep 1999 19:07:16 -0500
  • A formula to predict evolution? Fri, 03 Sep 1999 07:26:49 -0500
  • Re: The science educators' Vietnam Wed, 01 Sep 1999 13:37:32 -0500
• Gary Collins
  • Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:37:10 +0100
• grmorton@argolink.net
  • Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:25:20 +0000
  • Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:49:36 +0000
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:41:36 +0000
• Hapi Daiz
  • A little laugh re KS and AZ? Fri, 10 Sep 1999 18:37:12 -0700 (MST)
  • 90% Tue, 7 Sep 1999 08:26:29 -0700 (MST)
  • Materialistic Science Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:40:22 -0700 (MST)
• Hofmann, Jim
  • RE: Evolution of improved fitness Sun, 12 Sep 1999 22:51:43 -0700
• Howard J. Van Till
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:53:45 -0400
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 19:50:02 -0400
  • Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:34:56 -0400
• James Mahaffy
  • Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Sun, 26 Sep 1999 15:13:38 -0500
  • A more readable table for noise post Thu, 23 Sep 1999 22:03:41 -0500
  • Evolution and ASA lists and noise Wed, 22 Sep 1999 22:59:59 -0500
  • Roots of the coal-swamp Lycopods, Stigmaria. Sat, 04 Sep 1999 16:06:09 -0500
• Jason
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:59:42 -0400
• Jeff Stratford
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 09 Sep 1999 14:27:10 CDT
  • Re: Materialistic Science Wed, 01 Sep 1999 13:38:50 CDT
  • Re: Materialistic Science Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:09:10 CDT
  • Re: Materialistic Science Wed, 01 Sep 1999 10:54:44 CDT
• John E. Rylander
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:07:34 -0500
  • RE: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 24 Sep 1999 19:33:12 -0500
  • RE: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 17:13:10 -0500
  • RE: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 09:23:51 -0500
  • RE: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Wed, 22 Sep 1999 07:01:15 -0500
  • RE: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:55:44 -0500
  • RE: TE,souls, and freedom Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:44:22 -0500
  • RE: TE, souls and freedom Sun, 19 Sep 1999 20:49:08 -0500
  • RE: The "rock" of faith Sun, 19 Sep 1999 10:04:23 -0500
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:49:01 -0500
  • RE: TE,souls, and freedom Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:55:31 -0500
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:38:46 -0500
  • RE: TE, souls, and freedom Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:25:03 -0500
  • Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Thu, 16 Sep 1999 23:04:27 -0500
  • RE: TE, souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:26:46 -0500
  • RE: TE,souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:17:31 -0500
  • RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:35:48 -0500
  • RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 22:41:34 -0500
  • RE: 90% Mon, 13 Sep 1999 22:26:12 -0500
  • "A blueprint for the creation of life is about to be unveiled by scientists. " Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:19:25 -0500
• Jonathan Clarke
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... (was A Thu, 16 Sep 1999 21:55:40 +1000
• Jose Mendez
  • (no subject) Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
• Kendra
  • Gallup Poll Sample Mon, 13 Sep 1999 10:47:17 -0700 (MST)
  • Gallup Poll Release, 8-30-99 Mon, 13 Sep 1999 00:23:05 -0700 (MST)
  • "little joker" Sun, 12 Sep 1999 23:13:50 -0700 (MST)
• Loren Haarsma
  • Re: TE,souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 20:24:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:48:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Where the information comes from. Tue, 7 Sep 1999 17:05:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Where the information comes from. Tue, 7 Sep 1999 17:05:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Where the information comes from. Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:27:37 -0400 (EDT)
• Marcio Pie
  • Re: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:29:10 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:57:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's so-called Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:06:13 -0400 (EDT)
• Mark Phillips
  • Re: Death before the Fall (part 2) Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:35:48 +0930
  • Re: Death before the Fall (part 1) Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:34:07 +0930
  • Test Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:55:54 +0930
• MccarrickAD@nswccd.navy.mil
  • FW: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 11:21:40 -0400
• MikeBGene@aol.com
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Sat, 25 Sep 1999 12:08:03 EDT
  • Re: philosophy of discovery Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:16:57 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:06:28 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Thu, 23 Sep 1999 23:57:01 EDT
  • The Human Face of Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 23:50:15 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:04:02 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:53:27 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:38:37 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:46:45 EDT
  • Re: Inside/Outside Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:45:26 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:40:50 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:38:05 EDT
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:32:29 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:46:45 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Wed, 22 Sep 1999 08:35:44 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:39:31 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:53:35 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:48:57 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:46:04 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:31:09 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:18:10 EDT
  • Re: The "rock" of faith Sun, 19 Sep 1999 13:33:20 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls, and freedom Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:34:42 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:27:27 EDT
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Sat, 18 Sep 1999 16:57:42 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 16:52:35 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 02:17:47 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Sat, 18 Sep 1999 02:15:30 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:06:03 EDT
  • Re: Editorial by Sobran Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:47:37 EDT
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:23:21 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:20:55 EDT
  • Re: TE,Souls, and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:32:43 EDT
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:15:16 EDT
  • Bruce Alberts' Opinion Piece Tue, 14 Sep 1999 19:55:51 EDT
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:15:41 EDT
• mortongr@flash.net
  • Neanderthal cannibalism Thu, 30 Sep 1999 21:27:35 +0000
  • Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Thu, 30 Sep 1999 21:08:32 +0000
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:14:50 +0000
  • Re: Vertebrate evolution Sun, 26 Sep 1999 09:02:52 +0000
  • The First Americans Sat, 25 Sep 1999 15:53:16 +0000
  • Vertebrate evolution Sat, 25 Sep 1999 10:54:58 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Sat, 25 Sep 1999 10:33:00 +0000
  • RE: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:43:01 +0000
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:24:43 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:53:48 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:39:28 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:34:44 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:26:48 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:44:03 +0000
  • Re: Spetner and Shannon Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:49:21 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:40:03 +0000
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:36:28 +0000
  • RE: Editorial by Sobran Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:31:15 +0000
  • Re: Fw: RE: Re: Fast gravity--calling David Bowman (long) Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:42:55 +0000
  • Fish and the flood Mon, 13 Sep 1999 22:17:53 +0000
  • RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:33:04 +0000
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:23:54 +0000
  • Re: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:40:25 +0000
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:18:32 +0000
  • Re: Designer bugs (Was: "A blueprint for...) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:38:14 +0000
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Sat, 11 Sep 1999 09:21:01 +0000
  • Re: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it Sat, 11 Sep 1999 09:02:19 +0000
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Tue, 07 Sep 1999 21:59:15 +0000
  • H. erectus with sapiens traits Mon, 06 Sep 1999 20:34:31 +0000
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Thu, 02 Sep 1999 22:26:20 +0000
• Pim van Meurs
  • RE: Everyone Is Born with a Head for Numbers Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:40:32 -0700
  • RE: Human/chimp similarity measures Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:35:30 -0700
  • RE: Inherit an Ill Wind Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:33:40 -0700
  • RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:30:22 -0700
  • RE: Inherit an Ill Wind Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:43:53 -0700
  • RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 21:27:27 -0700
  • RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:59:56 -0700
  • RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:59:03 -0700
  • RE: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:55:14 -0700
  • RE: Phil Johnson's review of Pennock's `Tower of Babel' Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:22:17 -0700
  • Stephen confused? RE: Phil Johnson's review of Pennock's `Tower of Babel' Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:20:52 -0700
  • RE: Everyone Is Born with a Head for Numbers Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:19:53 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:18:36 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:15:46 -0700
  • RE: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:25:43 -0700
  • RE: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:22:04 -0700
  • RE: I do like to play devil's advocate (was Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity") Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:20:45 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:17:39 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:05:52 -0700
  • RE: Plumbing new depths (was What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC") Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:46:10 -0700
  • RE: Plumbing new depths (was What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC") Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:43:37 -0700
  • IC can be explained by Darwinian mechanisms. Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:42:14 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:36:35 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:28:50 -0700
  • RE: TE, souls and freedom Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:23:08 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 11:39:58 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 12:58:18 -0700
  • RE: Spetner and Shannon Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:21:03 -0700
  • RE: I've also read Spetner's book Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:11:19 -0700
  • RE: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:14:55 -0700
  • RE: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:45:05 -0700
  • RE: Spetner and Shannon Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:43:24 -0700
  • RE: TE, souls and freedom Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:41:55 -0700
  • Re: Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Editorial by Sobran Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:43:15 -0700
  • RE: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:50:31 -0700
  • RE: Belief in God Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:49:25 -0700
  • RE: TE, souls and freedom Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:47:16 -0700
  • RE: Lee Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 08:41:58 -0700
  • RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:13:24 -0700
  • RE: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:11:31 -0700
  • RE: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it ...) Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:10:39 -0700
  • RE: 90% Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:10:07 -0700
  • RE: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:08:27 -0700
  • RE: New theory: Gamma-ray blast spawned planets Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:07:20 -0700
  • RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott Mon, 13 Sep 1999 07:45:07 -0700
  • RE: Evolution of improved fitness Mon, 13 Sep 1999 00:12:03 -0700
  • Harmful mutations Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:05:01 -0700
  • RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:49:20 -0700
  • RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:47:02 -0700
  • Interesting resource Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:07:22 -0700
  • What's left of IC? Sun, 12 Sep 1999 14:48:39 -0700
  • =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_Subj=3A=09_What_I_Truly_Believe_Regarding?= Sun, 12 Sep 1999 14:15:32 -0700
  • RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:14:24 -0700
  • RE: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:11:49 -0700
  • RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:19:14 -0700
  • RE: A little laugh re KS and AZ? Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:13:54 -0700
  • RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:12:59 -0700
  • RE: Fine tuning argument once again... Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:53:06 -0700
  • Evolution of improved fitness Sat, 11 Sep 1999 12:52:15 -0700
  • RE: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Sat, 11 Sep 1999 12:47:06 -0700
  • Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Sat, 11 Sep 1999 12:15:09 -0700
  • A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry. Sat, 11 Sep 1999 11:50:24 -0700
  • RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 11:31:47 -0700
  • RE: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:08:04 -0700
  • RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:05:59 -0700
  • RE: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:03:04 -0700
  • RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:02:17 -0700
  • Fine tuning argument once again... Sat, 11 Sep 1999 09:59:58 -0700
  • RE: 90% Sat, 11 Sep 1999 09:57:41 -0700
  • RE: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 09:55:17 -0700
  • RE: Peppered moths...again??? Thu, 9 Sep 1999 20:12:45 -0700
  • RE: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Wed, 8 Sep 1999 21:03:16 -0700
  • RE: [breakpoint] Is the Sky Falling?, 9/1/99 Wed, 8 Sep 1999 21:01:09 -0700
  • RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Wed, 8 Sep 1999 20:59:16 -0700
  • RE: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:53:56 -0700
  • RE: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:28:41 -0700
  • RE: Reply to Bruce Alberts Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:22:11 -0700
  • RE: 90% Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:17:37 -0700
  • RE: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Tue, 7 Sep 1999 07:33:32 -0700
  • RE: Bill Dembski hits the jackpot! Tue, 7 Sep 1999 07:24:50 -0700
  • RE: Chimps don't talk, but they do cry Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:15:54 -0700
  • RE: SURVIVAL OF THE FADDIST Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:37:29 -0700
  • RE: Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:55:50 -0700
  • RE: Wall Street Journal: The Church of Darwin By Phillip E. Johnson Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:30:25 -0700
  • RE: Wall Street Journal: The Church of Darwin By Phillip E. Johnson Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:34:33 -0700
  • RE: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:51:51 -0700
  • RE: the Kansas state science standards (was Darkness spreads over Kansas) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:40:09 -0700
  • RE: transitions from a wolf-like creature to a whale? (was Rabbits in the Precambrian) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:06:04 -0700
  • RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 15:44:00 -0700
  • RE: Where the information comes from. Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:08:37 -0700
  • RE: This is bizarre Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:02:12 -0700
  • RE: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:47:52 -0700
  • RE: Intelligent design vs. evolution Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:45:54 -0700
  • RE: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:40:06 -0700
  • RE: The science educators' Vietnam Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:33:19 -0700
  • RE: This is bizarre Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:31:03 -0700
  • RE: This is bizarre Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:30:04 -0700
  • RE: This is bizarre Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:28:33 -0700
• R. Joel Duff
  • need web page address Fri, 10 Sep 1999 07:51:43 -0400
  • origins of the eye Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:09:33 -0400
• Stephen E. Jones
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Fri, 01 Oct 1999 06:50:08 +0800
  • Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Thu, 30 Sep 1999 19:55:15 +0800
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Thu, 30 Sep 1999 23:03:15 +0800
  • Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Spetner's book) Thu, 30 Sep 1999 06:40:21 +0800
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:49:48 +0800
  • Re: After the big bang Tue, 28 Sep 1999 06:13:21 +0800
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:20:13 +0800
  • Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:27:59 +0800
  • Re: This is design, yet it uses chance (was I've also read Spetner's book) Mon, 27 Sep 1999 17:54:57 +0800
  • Re: Inherit an Ill Wind Fri, 24 Sep 1999 21:36:57 +0800
  • Re: Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Sat, 25 Sep 1999 22:32:43 +0800
  • Re: Evolution and ASA lists and noise Sat, 25 Sep 1999 20:54:16 +0800
  • Re: Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity" Fri, 24 Sep 1999 21:01:56 +0800
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Fri, 24 Sep 1999 06:49:58 +0800
  • Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Fri, 24 Sep 1999 06:48:47 +0800
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Thu, 23 Sep 1999 21:23:21 +0800
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:47:42 +0800
  • Re: Everyone Is Born with a Head for Numbers Thu, 23 Sep 1999 06:55:40 +0800
  • Re: Phil Johnson's review of Pennock's `Tower of Babel' Tue, 21 Sep 1999 22:19:30 +0800
  • Re: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:42:29 +0800
  • Re: I do like to play devil's advocate (was Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity") Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:40:18 +0800
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:37:13 +0800
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom and a complaint Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:24:23 +0800
  • Re: Professor Steve Jones gives advice to creationists Mon, 20 Sep 1999 22:02:31 +0800
  • RE: Plumbing new depths (was What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC") Mon, 20 Sep 1999 06:25:19 +0800
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... (was A Mon, 20 Sep 1999 05:50:57 +0800
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... Mon, 20 Sep 1999 05:48:35 +0800
  • Re: Scientists make molecular motor Fri, 17 Sep 1999 19:33:04 +0800
  • Re: My thanks to Bertvan for his encouragment! (was Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors) Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:58:03 +0800
  • Re: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it ...) Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:29:37 +0800
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Thu, 16 Sep 1999 22:59:47 +0800
  • Re: TE, souls and freedom Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:39:21 +0800
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Thu, 16 Sep 1999 05:06:11 +0800
  • Re: What I Truly Believe Regarding "TE/EC" Thu, 16 Sep 1999 05:03:03 +0800
  • Re: Nanotechnology: Synthetic molecular motors Thu, 16 Sep 1999 04:54:05 +0800
  • Re: I would be prepared to reconsider my TE/ECs claim if... (was A Catholic sermon from Kansas) Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:42:22 +0800
  • Re: Plumbing new depths (was if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it ...) Tue, 14 Sep 1999 06:18:28 +0800
  • Re: 90% Tue, 14 Sep 1999 06:07:18 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Mon, 13 Sep 1999 21:26:27 +0800
  • Re: New theory: Gamma-ray blast spawned planets Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:48:05 +0800
  • Re: A little laugh re KS and AZ? Sun, 12 Sep 1999 22:40:13 +0800
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Sun, 12 Sep 1999 21:27:24 +0800
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Sun, 12 Sep 1999 21:24:00 +0800
  • Re: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:28:19 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:01:42 +0800
  • Re: Black hole detected swallowing matter Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:33:45 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:30:47 +0800
  • Re: 90% Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:24:17 +0800
  • Re: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything (was Where the information comes from) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:21:32 +0800
  • Re: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:13:04 +0800
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The scienceeducators' Vietnam) Thu, 09 Sep 1999 06:37:54 +0800
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Thu, 09 Sep 1999 06:30:38 +0800
  • Fwd: [breakpoint] Is the Sky Falling?, 9/1/99 Tue, 07 Sep 1999 22:46:20 +0800
  • Re: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Tue, 07 Sep 1999 20:55:28 +0800
  • Re: Where the information comes from. Tue, 07 Sep 1999 21:21:30 +0800
  • Re: Bill Dembski hits the jackpot! Tue, 07 Sep 1999 21:18:01 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was petty personal agendas) Tue, 07 Sep 1999 05:45:42 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Mon, 06 Sep 1999 06:24:16 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Sun, 05 Sep 1999 22:49:33 +0800
  • Re: Popper's so-called `recantation' (was The science educators' Vietnam) Sun, 05 Sep 1999 21:37:03 +0800
  • Re: Intelligent design vs. evolution Sun, 05 Sep 1999 13:46:36 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation (was There used to be some...) Fri, 03 Sep 1999 06:25:59 +0800
  • Re: Where the information comes from. Fri, 03 Sep 1999 06:08:32 +0800
  • Re: Scientists get exploding beetle in their sights Thu, 02 Sep 1999 23:14:33 +0800
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominem against Johnson (was re-whales from rodents) Thu, 02 Sep 1999 22:35:15 +0800
  • Re: Phillip E. Johnson complete web links Wed, 01 Sep 1999 23:00:03 +0800
• Steve Clark
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:22:31 -0500
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:13:40 -0500
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:37:54 -0500
  • teaching evolution in Wisconsin Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:49:00 -0500
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Tue, 07 Sep 1999 09:08:42 -0500
  • Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Wed, 01 Sep 1999 09:51:00 -0500
• Susan B
  • Re: Inherit an Ill Wind Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:42:20 -0500 (CDT)
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:18:40 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:21:43 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sat, 18 Sep 1999 21:36:58 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: A Catholic sermon from Kansas Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:06:53 -0500 (CDT)
  • TE,souls, and essential essence Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:34:24 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial? Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:30:43 -0500 (CDT)
  • RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:19:35 -0500 (CDT)
  • RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:05:20 -0500 (CDT)
  • The Kansas Battle from Reuters Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:01:01 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:32:46 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything (was Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:20:29 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: 90% Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:07:33 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: A little laugh re KS and AZ? Sat, 11 Sep 1999 09:28:03 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Reply to Bruce Alberts Tue, 7 Sep 1999 22:30:04 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: do evolutionists really need the peppered moth? Re: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:58:25 -0500 (CDT)
  • Kansas & Evolution Sat, 4 Sep 1999 22:04:56 -0500 (CDT)
• Susan Brassfield
  • RE: teaching evolution in Wisconsin Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:33:51 -0600
  • Re: philosophy of discovery Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:13:19 -0600
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:48:27 -0600
  • just for Bertvan Tue, 21 Sep 1999 16:54:13 -0600
  • Re: Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 16:52:54 -0600
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 14:26:17 -0600
  • Re: Experts Worry Tue, 21 Sep 1999 14:10:38 -0600
  • Re: Editorial by Sobran Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:26:37 -0600
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:42:59 -0600
  • Re: Year of Destiny?! Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:31:59 -0600
  • Re: Year of Destiny?! Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:33:06 -0600
  • Re: Popper's recantation Thu, 2 Sep 1999 09:55:33 -0600
  • Re: This is bizarre Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:43:02 -0600
  • Popper's recantation Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:35:37 -0600
• SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:26:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • More of the same from Stephen Wed, 08 Sep 1999 10:57:10 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Re: TE/EC ad hominems-a fact that cries out for an explanation Fri, 03 Sep 1999 11:08:57 -0500 (CDT)
• Tim Ikeda
  • Re: ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:53:50 -0400
  • Johnson as AIDS expert... Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:57:11 -0400
  • Re: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:25:59 -0400
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Sat, 18 Sep 1999 20:11:31 -0400
  • Re: I've also read Spetner's book Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:04:37 -0400
  • I've also read Spetner's book Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:56:47 -0400
  • Re: Lee Spetner's book Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:25:50 -0400
  • Designer bugs (Was: "A blueprint for...) Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:44:12 -0400
  • A wager about biology in the year 2059 Sun, 05 Sep 1999 12:56:22 -0400
• Troy Britain
  • RE: Experts Worry Wed, 22 Sep 1999 01:11:59 -0400
  • RE: Peppered moths...again??? Fri, 10 Sep 1999 03:06:36 -0400
  • Peppered moths...again??? Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:27:09 -0400
• Wesley R. Elsberry
  • Human/chimp similarity measures Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:28:34 -0500 (CDT)
  • Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity" Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:20:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: ADDING OR LOSING GENETIC INFORMATION THROUGH MUTATION Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:10:57 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: You May Have More Genes Than You Thought Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:56:29 -0500 (CDT)
  • Relevant literature distribution and Johnson - some numbers Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Inside/Outside Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:27:08 -0500 (CDT)
  • Inside/Outside Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:41:15 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:53:15 -0500 (CDT)
  • Wexler - Johnson comparisons Wed, 22 Sep 1999 08:45:27 -0500 (CDT)
  • Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity" Tue, 21 Sep 1999 11:21:26 -0500 (CDT)
  • Johnson as Expert (was Experts Worry...) Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:54:14 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Experts Worry That Public May Not Trust Science Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:07:11 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:18:53 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Sun, 19 Sep 1999 14:43:00 -0500 (CDT)
  • Spetner and Shannon Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:29:30 -0500 (CDT)
  • Philosophy of Science texts Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:11:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Hardy-Castle-Weinberg equilibrium Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:49:55 -0500 (CDT)
  • Spetner and Shannon Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:22:30 -0500 (CDT)
  • Hardy-Castle-Weinberg equilibrium Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:28:21 -0500 (CDT)
  • Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Wed, 15 Sep 1999 01:32:25 -0500 (CDT)
  • Dembski's "reiterations" post: Explaining Specified Complexity Tue, 14 Sep 1999 20:51:33 -0500 (CDT)
  • Going the other way... Sun, 5 Sep 1999 22:32:59 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Sat, 4 Sep 1999 10:04:11 -0500 (CDT)
  • Dembski, freedom, and the Soviet Union Sat, 4 Sep 1999 00:37:56 -0500 (CDT)
• William A. Dembski
  • Re: Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity" Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:56:50 -0600

Last message date: Thu 30 Sep 1999 - 22:24:50 EDT
Archived on: Thu Sep 30 1999 - 22:24:59 EDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives