[...]
>
>Here we have a good case of metaphysical naturalism, masquerading as
>methodological naturalism, being applied to "religion", and in this case
>the *Christian* "religion".
>
>Would Howard or any other TE/ECs argue against the consistent application
>of science's methodological naturalism to the *Christian* "religion", and
>in particular its claims of "supernatural intervention in the universe"?
>
It seems to me that you answer your own question. If metaphysical
naturalism is masquerading as methodological naturalism, then
it is not a consistent application of methodological naturalism.
Brian Harper | "If you don't understand
Associate Professor | something and want to
Applied Mechanics | sound profound, use the
The Ohio State University | word 'entropy'"
| -- Morrowitz