I would cite the case of Wegener who proposed continental drift. He was a
meteorologist who studied geology and presented his scenario for earth
history. He was rejected for years and finally accepted. He was an
outsider that made a difference.
But the distinction between him and Johnson is that Johnson presents no
scenario for his vision of earth history. All he presents are critiques.
He never seems to have the courage to stick his neck out and actually make
aprediction as to what science might find in the future. All the examples
I have seen in this thread are examples of people who made predictions
And Johnson, as you are aware, is not attacking my religion.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution