RE: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:22:04 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity""
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: I do like to play devil's advocate (was Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity")"

Yes, Stephen why not discuss Pennock's book? We all understand why Johnson does not like it.

----------
From: Tim Ikeda[SMTP:tikeda@sprintmail.hormel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 5:25 PM
To: evolution@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism

Stephen writes:
[...]
> I will post Johnson's review and Pennock's response in my next
> upload. [...]

Thanks, but that's quite needless given that the URL's have been
posted here on at least two separate occassions.

- Tim Ikeda
tikeda@sprintmail.hormel.com (despam address before use)

Next message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Dembski, Pennock, and the etymology of "specified complexity""
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: I do like to play devil's advocate (was Dembski's "Explaining Specified Complexity")"