RE: Ken Ham vs Genie Scott

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:13:24 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Arthur V. Chadwick: "Re: Lee Spetner's book"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial?"

John: If they would switch from the old positivistic "science = facts, religion =
values" to a more sophisticated "science = physical, religion/philosophy =
metaphysical", they'd be on -much- stronger ground intellectually, but I
think their militantly atheist supporters would be uncomfortable with that,
since that doesn't imply factual atheism.

hear hear if some creationists could agree to this as well then the world would be a better place. But some militant Christian supporters will be uncomfortable with that.

Next message: Arthur V. Chadwick: "Re: Lee Spetner's book"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: Can A Duplication Mutation Be Beneficial?"