RE: preferring a naturalistic explanation to everything

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:08:04 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Susan B: "The Kansas Battle from Reuters"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)"

Kevin: In my opinion, many creationists and ID theorists engage preferentially in
the third kind of lie, so that if exposed they can claim that all they are
guilty of is making an intellectual mistake.

I once fell for this for a short period of time. I believed that Morris' book 'scientific creationism' contained all the answers. Luckily my scientific curiosity took over and I studied the issues, only to find out to by great horor that most of the book was hardly supportable scientifically. Science saved me from remaining a YEC'er. Thank God for that.

Next message: Susan B: "The Kansas Battle from Reuters"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)"