Re: Fine tuning argument once again...

andrew (amandell@jpusa.chi.il.us)
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:25:45 -0500

Pim Van Meurs
What exactly do you object to in the wonder of "fine tuning"?
The way it is applied as a "proof" I would hope. Merely showing how odd and
glorious this whole place is doesn't seem to be out of place no matter the
state of your "naturalism":)

At 09:59 AM 9/11/99 -0700, Pim van Meurs wrote:
>
>Here is a BBC article from a month ago, which mentions the detection of a
>...
>
>SJ: "Astronomers believe that in the past our own galaxy may have had an
>active black hole at its core. Although it is still there, it is not now
being
>fuelled by a giant accretion disk. Lucky for us. If it was, then the high-
>energy radiation from it might make life very difficult indeed."
>
>SJ : This yet more evidence for the fine-tuning design argument in respect
of life
>on Earth and against the SETI assumption that life in the universe is
>common.
>
>So you have established that life started on earth because the conditions
were right. Now what evidence is there that the conditions were made to be
right for life to start on earth? The 'fine tuning' design argument, like
so many design arguments is severely lacking in any supporting data.
>
>