RE: if Stan really did intend to help, then I thank him for it (was More of the same from Stephen)

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:03:04 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)"

Glen: I am amazed at your ability to imply that Stan is lying and then thank him
at the same time. This is truly bizarre, Stephen. Why can't you just
accept that Stan is telling the truth?

For the same reason he cannot accept that Popper recanted.

Glen: Why is it that you seem to think that you are sole the judge of everyone else's motives etcs. What makes you think that he is required to support you? Does the world revolve around
you? Does the word megalomania mean anything to you?

Next message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery (was Reply to Bruce Alberts)"