Experts Worry

Bertvan@aol.com
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:26:42 EDT

>I want to see some of your evidence against. Mind posting some of it to the
>list? There's an awful lot of evidence that suggests that "micro" evolution
>has been happening all along and that these small changes have been
>accumulating through the eons. The hominid material arranged solely by age
>alone tells a tale of change through time that's tough for you guys to
>explain away.

>So post some factual evididence that mutations aren't random or that
>natural selection doesn't select beneficial mutations or that selected
>mutations aren't accumulated over time. I can find you evidence for all
>those things. Lots of it. Until you come up with some evidence to support
>your opinion it is hot air.

Hi Susan,

Reasons for doubting macroevolution is merely an accumulation of micro
evolution has been presented many times. Denton, Behe, Berlinski, Dembski,
Johnson, Hoyle, Wickramasinge, Kauffman and Spetner are just a few, and I'm
sure there will be more. I certainly have nothing original to add, and see no
reason to repeat their material. You interpret their evidence differently
than they do. Your priviledge. It is also your priviledge to call anything
with which you disagree "hot air". Not very classy, but your priviledge.

Bertvan