RE: TE, souls and freedom

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:47:16 -0700

Bertvan: The neo Darwinist establishment has managed to convince the public that any criticism of neo Darwinism is "creationism", that "science" should denounce anyone criticizing the
slightest aspect of Darwinism, that such strident criticism is a noble battle
against ignorance and superstition.

Are you sure you are not creating your own strawman here dear Bert? Perhaps you should try to support your argument with some (convincing) evidence?
Bertvan
I like you thoughts on the evolution of the mind, but why do you insist
physical evolution must have been the result of random processes, but believe
spiritual evolution was not?

Well at least for 'physical evolution' the evidence is quite overwhelming but if you have a better hypothesis... Well, do the science.