But people also believe in fairies, UFO's all based upon 'evidence'. But this evidence hardly ever is scientific. So the two as such are mutually exclusive/
>Mike: Thus, it comes down to this. If you don't see any evidence for God's
>existence, then of course you're going to rule out intelligent intervention.
Pim van Meurs: It's not what I believe I see. My statement should be seen in
the light of scientific enquiry.
Mike: When it comes to God's existence, science has nothing to say. That is,
evidence can exist (recognized due to metaphysical assumptions) even if it
is not acknowledged by science. I will recognize your statement in the light
of scientific inquiry, but as I said before, I am not interested in how to
label things.
What value does this evidence then? Sure, evidence can exist but can we recognize it as such?
Mike