Evolution - October 2000
By Date

740 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 06:34:35 EDT
Ending: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 21:17:15 EDT

RE: More on Ruse Don Frack (Thu Oct 04 2001 - 21:17:15 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:58:48 EST)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... AutismUK@aol.com (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:06:22 EST)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Ralph Krumdieck (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 16:22:27 EST)
Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger) Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 15:04:27 EST)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:58:59 EST)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:43:31 EST)
Re: petty bickering academics Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:28:09 EST)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:12:59 EST)
Re: New list? Susan Cogan (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 09:15:47 EST)
New list? Richard Wein (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 03:44:50 EST)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:23:49 EST)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Ivar Ylvisaker (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 22:46:23 EST)
Re: ID and Creationism Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 22:18:44 EST)
Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:08:22 EST)
Re: But is it deception? Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:07:01 EST)
Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #3 (was for SJones, part 2) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:04:44 EST)
Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:45:47 EST)
Re: But is it deception? Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:29:08 EST)
Re: More on Dembski and Baylor Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:19:01 EST)
Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #2 (was for SJones (was: mtDNA etc... Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:17:47 EST)
Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #1 (was for SJones (was: mtDNA etc... Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:02:16 EST)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics Tedd Hadley (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 14:11:39 EST)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 13:14:19 EST)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . Susan Cogan (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 12:53:28 EST)
Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 12:05:42 EST)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 11:23:05 EST)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 07:13:21 EST)
Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) AutismUK@aol.com (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 02:24:31 EST)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 18:50:50 EST)
Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #2 (was for SJones, part 2) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:56:44 EST)
Re: ID and Creationism Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:51:58 EST)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:40:24 EST)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 08:44:08 EST)
Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #1 (was for SJones (was: mtDNA etc...)) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 08:32:18 EST)
Re: Schutzenberger and simulation Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 01:58:38 EST)
Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 01:51:22 EST)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 01:00:54 EST)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Stephen E. Jones (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 23:53:52 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:49:23 EST)
Re: Peer-review article submissions DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:20:35 EST)
Re: Peer-review article submissions DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:08:40 EST)
Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:04:17 EST)
Re: Peer-review article submissions Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:05:54 EST)
Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, K... Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:01:48 EST)
Re: loyal to the data? (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:00:27 EST)
Re: loyal to the data? (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:57:52 EST)
Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:56:46 EST)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 09:15:26 EST)
Peer-review article submissions Wesley R. Elsberry (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 11:08:17 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics silk (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 04:53:29 EDT)
Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington Richard Wein (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 07:58:57 EDT)
Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington Stephen E. Jones (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 19:58:05 EDT)
Re: loyal to the data? (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Stephen E. Jones (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 19:50:52 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 18:23:41 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics Tedd Hadley (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 17:26:37 EDT)
Re: when natural selection pumps its complexity up to the next level (was Schutzenberger) Susan Cogan (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 15:40:25 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 13:36:04 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 13:27:55 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics Tedd Hadley (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 12:45:07 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 11:53:28 EDT)
by the way (was 'But is it deception?) Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:12:08 EDT)
Re: But is it deception? (pat attn. SJones!) Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:10:24 EDT)
Re: End of Darwinism? Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:04:58 EDT)
Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) Richard Wein (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 09:42:25 EDT)
Re: End of Darwinism? Susan Cogan (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 09:13:07 EDT)
Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics Richard Wein (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 06:41:17 EDT)
More on Dembski and Baylor Richard Wein (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 03:22:57 EDT)
RE: But is it deception? Troy Britain (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 03:31:39 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Ivar Ylvisaker (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 01:00:08 EDT)
But is it deception? Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 01:22:11 EDT)
Re: End of Darwinism? bill r wald (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 22:47:15 EDT)
Re: End of Darwinism? Tedd Hadley (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 20:40:00 EDT)
Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 19:28:32 EDT)
Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 19:11:46 EDT)
God makes a comeback Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 18:30:31 EDT)
Baylor's dismissal of Polyani Center director Dembski was not a smart move Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 18:13:43 EDT)
End of Darwinism? M.A. Johnson (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 18:16:11 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Richard Wein (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:56:00 EDT)
petty bickering academics Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 16:26:58 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Susan Cogan (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:29:28 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:12:22 EDT)
petty bickering academics Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:41:24 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Tedd Hadley (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:28:02 EDT)
petty bickering academics Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 08:35:13 EDT)
Re: Entropy Richard Wein (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 05:34:19 EDT)
Re: Entropy Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:54:23 EDT)
Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:16:44 EDT)
Re: Entropy DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:10:29 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Richard Wein (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 19:51:09 EDT)
Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 18:43:13 EDT)
when natural selection pumps its complexity up to the next level (was Schutzenberger) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 18:40:14 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Susan Cogan (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 15:26:02 EDT)
Re: Entropy Richard Wein (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 12:09:24 EDT)
Is life an ubiquitous piece of the design of the universe? Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 12:26:04 EDT)
petty bickering academics Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 11:23:30 EDT)
Re: Entropy David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 10:13:58 EDT)
Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 09:02:26 EDT)
Re: Entropy Richard Wein (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 09:02:05 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 07:38:52 EDT)
Re: Entropy David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 02:42:44 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 19:06:58 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 19:08:01 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 17:13:13 EDT)
Re: Entropy bill r wald (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 16:23:31 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:37:42 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:11:46 EDT)
Re: My rebuttal of the design inference Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:03:30 EDT)
Re: petty bickering academics Susan Cogan (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 10:33:03 EDT)
petty bickering academics Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 10:14:20 EDT)
Goodbye, little man (was: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion?) Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 09:27:37 EDT)
Re: Huxter IS Pantrog, and Pangloss, and HandJobFromYourMom! Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 09:04:35 EDT)
ICR suckered by April Fool's joke. glenn morton (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 02:45:14 EDT)
Re: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 18:38:38 EDT)
Houston Chronicle on Demski's removal Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:48:10 EDT)
Re: Entropy David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:15:44 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:14:33 EDT)
Re: Entropy David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:09:29 EDT)
Huxter IS Pantrog, and Pangloss, and HandJobFromYourMom! DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:46:03 EDT)
Re: Turing Ivar Ylvisaker (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:01:04 EDT)
Re: My rebuttal of the desin inference. DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 18:33:51 EDT)
Examples of natural selection generating CSI Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:54:17 EDT)
Re: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:35:23 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:44:32 EDT)
Re: My rebuttal of the design inference Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:17:03 EDT)
by the way (was anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion?) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:08:43 EDT)
Re: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:07:31 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) Richard Wein (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:42:45 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:34:49 EDT)
anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:23:44 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:05:47 EDT)
My rebuttal of the design inference Richard Wein (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:56:53 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 09:23:41 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 07:31:06 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:33:38 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:30:28 EDT)
Re: for SJones (was: mtDNA etc...) DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:30:31 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:08:21 EDT)
Re: Dembski and miracles Susan Cogan (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 12:55:23 EDT)
Dembski and miracles Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 11:49:18 EDT)
Turing Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 11:46:56 EDT)
Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 10:48:35 EDT)
Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 10:37:20 EDT)
for SJones, part 2 Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 07:39:20 EDT)
for SJones (was: mtDNA etc...) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 07:35:33 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 03:08:25 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 02:48:24 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 02:41:47 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Ivar Ylvisaker (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 02:31:43 EDT)
Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:49:58 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:11:16 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:49:01 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:45:34 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:44:38 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 21:46:20 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 21:09:42 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 20:10:55 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 20:08:45 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 18:03:15 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 18:02:04 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:29:22 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:28:27 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:27:13 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:26:04 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 14:42:11 EDT)
Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 14:21:06 EDT)
IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 09:37:19 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers Richard Wein (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 07:09:24 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Richard Wein (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 06:53:59 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers Richard Wein (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 06:52:52 EDT)
Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) Richard Wein (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 05:19:45 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:32:45 EDT)
Re: Entropy Erratum David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:12:44 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:59:20 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:52:40 EDT)
Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:43:55 EDT)
Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:36:01 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:26:02 EDT)
Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:12:37 EDT)
IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:21:47 EDT)
Re:To all uncommitted lurkers Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:22:29 EDT)
Re: This 'uncommited lurker' responds... Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:18:45 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:11:32 EDT)
Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:08:40 EDT)
Uncommited Lurkers revsited Dawn (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 19:47:37 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers Emm Foster (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 05:08:55 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 19:11:50 EDT)
Let's not give them too much Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:34:09 EDT)
Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:12:47 EDT)
RE: inversion of magnetic fields Keith Littleton (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 16:03:34 EDT)
Information request re: inclusion of ANS models as EA's Wesley R. Elsberry (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 13:00:57 EDT)
This 'uncommited lurker' responds... Dawn (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:48:27 EDT)
Re: Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:33:11 EDT)
Re:To all uncommitted lurkers MULLERD@chplink.chp.edu (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:00:33 EDT)
Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 10:37:41 EDT)
Ccogan: Literally Infinite: stuff and Pentium's (and his growing "aggression") DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 10:08:37 EDT)
Re: To all uncommitted lurkers Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 09:57:19 EDT)
Ccogan: part 1: "literally infinite" problems DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 09:37:40 EDT)
Chris Cogan: Entropy DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 08:58:58 EDT)
To all uncommitted lurkers Richard Wein (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:23:43 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:48:12 EDT)
Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:25:15 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:52:43 EDT)
Could it be that FMAJ finally gets it????? DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:20:34 EDT)
Susan's at it again DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:47:26 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:43:14 EDT)
FMAJ and his outdated support of abiogenesis DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:55:48 EDT)
Re: Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:02:15 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:01:06 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:48:06 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:08:48 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:03:04 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:55:39 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:41:46 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism (and epistemology and dogmatism) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:28:46 EDT)
Design and abiogenesis DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:35:20 EDT)
Re: Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:21:15 EDT)
Let's not give them too much DNAunion@aol.com (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:10:22 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 01:14:01 EDT)
Re: Plonk! Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 01:00:54 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 00:57:21 EDT)
RE: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention Stephen E. Jones (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 23:22:25 EDT)
Rapid adaptation Ralph Krumdieck (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 16:43:26 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Susan Cogan (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 15:13:45 EDT)
IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 14:53:12 EDT)
Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 13:56:07 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 13:35:47 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) Ralph Krumdieck (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 10:59:55 EDT)
RE: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention Keith Littleton (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 10:08:07 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) Richard Wein (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 04:25:00 EDT)
Re: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention Richard Wein (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 03:57:19 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 02:53:09 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 02:27:56 EDT)
Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 19:19:00 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 16:48:42 EDT)
Re: 47 aspects of evolution simulation programs (was Schutzenberger) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:47:24 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:36:04 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:29:36 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 09:38:25 EDT)
RE: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention Hofmann, Jim (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 19:45:42 EDT)
Re: Do Materialists call everything they don't understand "mumbo jumbo"? Susan Cogan (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 13:06:08 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 15:48:22 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism (and epistemology and dogmatism) Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 15:47:00 EDT)
Re: Baylor Lariat article on DI web site Richard Wein (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 14:33:28 EDT)
Re: Baylor Lariat article on DI web site Richard Wein (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 13:09:00 EDT)
Do Materialists call everything they don't understand "mumbo jumbo"? Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 12:20:19 EDT)
Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention Wesley R. Elsberry (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 12:56:32 EDT)
Baylor Lariat article on DI web site Wesley R. Elsberry (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 12:17:13 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Susan Cogan (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:54:46 EDT)
Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 09:54:12 EDT)
How to prove supernaturalism? Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 02:10:44 EDT)
Baylor, the Polanyi Center, and Dembski Wesley R. Elsberry (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 02:07:59 EDT)
Re: inversion of magnetic fields Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:55:53 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:30:15 EDT)
Re: Evolution Elswhere? Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:53:32 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:54:51 EDT)
Re: News from Baylor U. Richard Wein (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:02:54 EDT)
RE: News from Baylor U. Hofmann, Jim (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:14:28 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Susan Cogan (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 11:02:21 EDT)
Re: News from Baylor U. Richard Wein (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 10:40:24 EDT)
inversion of magnetic fields Marcio Pie (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 09:41:25 EDT)
Re: Evolution Elswhere? Richard Wein (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 08:42:49 EDT)
Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 02:46:51 EDT)
News from Baylor U. Wesley R. Elsberry (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 02:53:47 EDT)
Re: Evolution Elswhere? David Bradbury (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 23:23:29 EDT)
Re: Plonk! Richard Wein (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 21:47:28 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Richard Wein (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 21:46:12 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 Richard Wein (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 21:08:35 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 18:06:09 EDT)
Re: Plonk! Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 18:00:01 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:57:18 EDT)
Re: FAQ: Design and designer: Separate questions (was ID *does* require a designer! (but ...)) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:54:09 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:50:31 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:50:47 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:26:39 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 07:28:38 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 06:56:45 EDT)
Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws bill r wald (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 14:26:04 EDT)
Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws Ralph Krumdieck (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:36:15 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #1 Tedd Hadley (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 16:56:08 EDT)
Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 16:38:48 EDT)
Scientific Disagreements Susan Cogan (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 15:53:44 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 Tedd Hadley (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 13:14:45 EDT)
Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws Richard Wein (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 04:24:31 EDT)
Schutzenberger and simulation Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 05:28:00 EDT)
Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 03:22:43 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 02:01:19 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 21:29:34 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger David Bradbury (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 21:31:17 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Susan Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 15:20:26 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:39:23 EDT)
Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:32:07 EDT)
Re: Plonk Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:31:54 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:31:12 EDT)
Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 12:09:44 EDT)
Plonk FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:23:06 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:17:32 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:16:14 EDT)
Re: Plonk! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:11:00 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:09:41 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:57:00 EDT)
Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) Susan Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:56:04 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Susan Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:53:38 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:49:43 EDT)
Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:40:13 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:39:07 EDT)
Re: 47 aspects of evolution simulation programs (was Schutzenberger) Richard Wein (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 08:25:31 EDT)
Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) Richard Wein (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 08:00:45 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:44:02 EDT)
47 aspects of evolution simulation programs (was Schutzenberger) Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:42:37 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:08:25 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:06:59 EDT)
Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 06:57:57 EDT)
Plonk! Richard Wein (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 06:25:28 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 05:26:54 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 05:12:56 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 04:12:13 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 04:02:10 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 03:51:22 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:36:23 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:38:47 EDT)
Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:05:36 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:01:11 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 01:11:19 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:28:07 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) evolution of IC in computer model DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:23:19 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 20:51:55 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 20:22:24 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:53:50 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:44:58 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:08:20 EDT)
Re: I was hoping S.Jones would reply to this (was 'Mitochondrial DNA... Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 17:13:53 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 17:20:22 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #1 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 04:35:59 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 04:35:24 EDT)
Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:14:34 EDT)
Re: Euphemisms and More (was What really killed T. Rex?) Chris Cogan (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 01:53:22 EDT)
Fw: Re: Euphemisms and More (was What really killed T. Rex?) bill r wald (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 17:18:15 EDT)
Get paid to surf! Best programs here! Easy cash for all (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 19:07:49 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 11:56:49 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Huxter4441@aol.com (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 09:56:46 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:31:48 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:31:35 EDT)
Re: (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 02:58:07 EDT)
Euphemisms and More (was What really killed T. Rex?) Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 02:23:35 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Chris Cogan (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 01:52:45 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Richard Wein (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 23:50:06 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger David Bradbury (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 22:55:01 EDT)
Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch Susan Cogan (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 17:45:40 EDT)
Re: (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model Brian D Harper (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 20:45:09 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 14:30:03 EDT)
I was hoping S.Jones would reply to this (was 'Mitochondrial DNA... Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 13:58:08 EDT)
Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 13:54:34 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 12:51:56 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Richard Wein (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 11:29:42 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 02:32:10 EDT)
Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 20:19:07 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 20:10:28 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 19:43:01 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 19:30:44 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:42:55 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:37:49 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:20:08 EDT)
Re: Flat earth (uneducated view) Tedd Hadley (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 14:35:08 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:55:47 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Susan Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:49:05 EDT)
Dembski on A-E-S triad Wesley R. Elsberry (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:04:04 EDT)
Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) Susan Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 10:40:27 EDT)
using nDNA to infer human evolutionary history Marcio Pie (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 07:17:12 EDT)
Evolution Elswhere? Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 03:38:35 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 02:40:45 EDT)
Re: Flat earth (uneducated view) Allen Roy (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:59:31 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Allen Roy (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:44:05 EDT)
Re: The future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:29:00 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:28:52 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:28:53 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:28:44 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:26:17 EDT)
Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:25:31 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:25:13 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:07:01 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:06:36 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:05:50 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:05:19 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:04:52 EDT)
Re: Flat earth (uneducated view) FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:01:59 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 00:45:01 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 00:39:39 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 23:18:23 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 23:06:28 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Allen Roy (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 20:41:14 EDT)
HOT NEW BIOTECH STOCK - 2 NEWS RELEASES !! HOTSTOCKS@aba.com (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:34:46 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:13:57 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:13:43 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 18:37:40 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 17:48:38 EDT)
Re: A new private mailing list? Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 17:07:39 EDT)
Re: Del Ratzsch new book: `Science & Its Limits' Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 16:53:39 EDT)
Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 16:50:12 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism Stephen E. Jones (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 16:34:19 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? Brian D Harper (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:05:57 EDT)
Definition of intelligence Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 15:13:05 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 14:10:06 EDT)
Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 13:22:59 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? billwald@juno.com (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 12:28:49 EDT)
Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 12:35:52 EDT)
Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 11:05:27 EDT)
Re: Information request Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 11:25:14 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 09:35:55 EDT)
Fwd: Dr. Roland Hirsch Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 09:15:53 EDT)
Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:43:16 EDT)
Re: (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:39:00 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) in silico evolution (FPGAs) Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:35:55 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:33:46 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) evolution of IC in computer model Richard Wein (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:28:56 EDT)
Flat earth (uneducated view) Allen Roy (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 02:07:20 EDT)
Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 21:47:33 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 19:38:21 EDT)
Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 17:03:22 EDT)
Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 08:44:17 EDT)
The Value of Debate: For Bertvan Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 18:35:44 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) in silico evolution (FPGAs) Tedd Hadley (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 18:25:22 EDT)
Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? billwald@juno.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 14:58:51 EDT)
(non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:33:52 EDT)
Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? Ralph Krumdieck (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:31:24 EDT)
(non-flame post) in silico evolution (FPGAs) DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:27:13 EDT)
(non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:57:28 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:43:44 EDT)
(non-flame post) evolution of IC in computer model DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:30:17 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:14:57 EDT)
Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:38:11 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 09:25:28 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 09:05:05 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 08:59:26 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Richard Wein (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 04:10:17 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Richard Wein (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 04:17:06 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:49:58 EDT)
Re: The future for ID DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:11:48 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:37:38 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:23:10 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:07:20 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:45:38 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:27:03 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:28:43 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:23:51 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Ivar Ylvisaker (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:09:39 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 23:56:09 EDT)
Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 23:01:16 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 22:59:45 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 22:59:07 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 21:14:12 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 20:04:24 EDT)
Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 19:48:04 EDT)
Re: Natural selection and ID DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 19:42:51 EDT)
Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 18:33:07 EDT)
Re: Future of this list? Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 18:01:39 EDT)
Re: understanding of what it means `to be (intelligently) designed' (was A THIRD OF U.S. SCHOOLS...) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 17:22:28 EDT)
Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 10:42:24 EDT)
Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 09:05:54 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 05:40:39 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 23:45:45 EDT)
Re: Posting from other resources Stephen E. Jones (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 20:59:37 EDT)
Re: Design, Intelligent Design & irreducible complexity (was ID vs.?) Stephen E. Jones (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 21:10:51 EDT)
Re: Flat Earth Myth Chris Cogan (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 16:45:17 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Wesley R. Elsberry (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 17:13:57 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 15:21:09 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 15:18:05 EDT)
Re: Future of this list? Richard Wein (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 06:13:50 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:10:30 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:02:47 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:52:58 EDT)
Re: Future of this list? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:44:16 EDT)
Re: Future of this list? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:42:07 EDT)
Re: Future of this list? Bill Payne (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 21:47:42 EDT)
Flat Earth Myth David Bradbury (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 18:05:28 EDT)
RE: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? li dorris (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:55:30 EDT)
Future of this list? Terry M. Gray (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:41:18 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:18:28 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:19:29 EDT)
Re: The future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:16:51 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:03:27 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:00:33 EDT)
Re: The future for ID DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 13:51:21 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 13:23:29 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:57:39 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:54:20 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:50:27 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:36:36 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Richard Wein (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:16:42 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Richard Wein (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:13:43 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Richard Wein (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:05:32 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Richard Wein (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 11:37:48 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 10:47:03 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:08:46 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:07:20 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:07:12 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:03:01 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:45:04 EDT)
Re: Really? DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:56:47 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:56:48 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:51:38 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:50:30 EDT)
Re: NS and intelligent designers FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:47:05 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:45:33 EDT)
NS and intelligent designers Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:29:04 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:44:17 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:42:00 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:39:43 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:38:05 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:33:21 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:24:42 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:18:09 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:16:59 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:14:50 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:11:44 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:10:35 EDT)
Re: Designing Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:03:47 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:57:02 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:50:24 EDT)
Designing Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:31:51 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:46:57 EDT)
Fwd: ID and Creationism DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:46:06 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Ivar Ylvisaker (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:42:46 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:35:51 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:25:18 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:18:38 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Ivar Ylvisaker (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:18:21 EDT)
Really? Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:00:29 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:08:56 EDT)
RE: The Wedge Project Don Frack (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:54:27 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:50:05 EDT)
WHY SO MUCH SMART MONEY IS SO HIGH ON READ-RITE !! HotStocks@aba.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:43:05 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:42:00 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:34:44 EDT)
Natural selection and ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:34:45 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:26:40 EDT)
Re: fear of the religious implications of design Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:20:14 EDT)
Genetic Rigidity? Chris Cogan (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:19:16 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:21:23 EDT)
Re: The future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:06:24 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:06:23 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Ivar Ylvisaker (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:58:52 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:46:03 EDT)
Re: The future for ID DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:46:09 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:23:23 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:01:49 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:59:33 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:55:15 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:57:08 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:37:22 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:28:08 EDT)
Re: ID and Creationism DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:26:08 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:21:06 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:22:10 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:15:27 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:59:39 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:49:23 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:36:54 EDT)
Re: The future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:27:23 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:20:28 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:09:16 EDT)
Re: The future for ID DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:07:53 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 20:45:23 EDT)
Re: Schutzenberger Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 20:11:34 EDT)
Re: fear of the religious implications of design Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 06:47:32 EDT)
Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 19:28:29 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 18:54:51 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Ralph Krumdieck (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 17:30:17 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 16:16:22 EDT)
Re: The future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 15:18:09 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Ralph Krumdieck (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 14:44:15 EDT)
Re: The future for ID DNAunion@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:40:10 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:20:32 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 12:49:15 EDT)
Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer Ralph Krumdieck (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 11:15:48 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:29:58 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Chris Cogan (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:13:22 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Vernon Jenkins (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:07:44 EDT)
Re: The Wedge Project Stephen E. Jones (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 09:35:47 EDT)
Human designers vs. God-as-designer Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 23:57:08 EDT)
Re: What really killed T. Rex? Stephen E. Jones (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 17:06:22 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 17:33:16 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:46:07 EDT)
Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:24:45 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:07:33 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:59:24 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:59:18 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:47:43 EDT)
The future for ID Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:12:42 EDT)
Is Intelligent Design Creationism? li dorris (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:04:30 EDT)
Re: Welsberry: Generic vs Specific Wesley R. Elsberry (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:29:58 EDT)
Welsberry: Generic vs Specific DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 12:34:41 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:38:46 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:36:39 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:34:18 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 10:47:42 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 09:39:31 EDT)
Flat Earth Myth Allen Roy (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 08:52:41 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 07:43:20 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 07:40:36 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Richard Wein (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 05:00:31 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID Richard Wein (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:58:27 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Richard Wein (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:53:32 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Richard Wein (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:44:20 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 03:29:57 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:53:22 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:44:48 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:31:51 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:27:28 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:23:10 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:19:34 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:17:59 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Chris Cogan (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:11:47 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:03:48 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:56:49 EDT)
Re: The Future for ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:53:58 EDT)
Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:51:31 EDT)
Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:49:12 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:47:40 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:04:42 EDT)
The Future for ID Nucacids@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:01:25 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 00:54:27 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:53:19 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:47:44 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:40:52 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:35:56 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:21:04 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Mark Isaak (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 21:45:32 EDT)
Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? Nucacids@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 20:31:30 EDT)
Is Intelligent Design Creationism? li dorris (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 19:28:19 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Richard Wein (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 18:30:57 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 17:03:52 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:15:11 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:13:45 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:12:03 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:09:53 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:46:25 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:27:00 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution FMAJ1019@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:23:30 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! FMAJ1019@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:18:36 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Tedd Hadley (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:06:16 EDT)
Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:48:35 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:35:08 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! DNAunion@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:28:50 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:26:37 EDT)
evidence for ID in Nature (?)[re:Nelson Alonso] Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 11:38:12 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Richard Wein (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 05:48:56 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Richard Wein (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 04:44:09 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 01:12:10 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Chris Cogan (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 00:06:33 EDT)
ID and Creationism Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 23:56:26 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 23:42:43 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 19:53:26 EDT)
Re: Numerical Significance Vernon Jenkins (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:48:19 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Nucacids@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:46:51 EDT)
Network Marketing Works! desiree0871@ladymailer.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:55:30 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Ed.Babinski@furman.edu (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:40:37 EDT)
Nelson's "thought experiment" Ed.Babinski@furman.edu (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:34:50 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Ed.Babinski@furman.edu (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:18:01 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Howard J. Van Till (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 15:41:45 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 15:27:40 EDT)
Re: Darwinist demographics Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:43:39 EDT)
Re: Response to Baylor Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:41:13 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Ralph Krumdieck (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:30:36 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Chris Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:24:51 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Richard Wein (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:17:10 EDT)
Re: Numerical Significance David Bradbury (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:08:20 EDT)
Re: Response to Baylor Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:01:56 EDT)
Darwinist demographics Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:38:21 EDT)
WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:48:41 EDT)
Re: muliplte persona alert! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:35:35 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. Paul Nelson (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:26:05 EDT)
Re: CSI, GAs, etc. FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:04:20 EDT)
CSI, GAs, etc. Paul Nelson (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 11:54:06 EDT)
muliplte persona alert! Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 10:28:01 EDT)
Re: Michael Behe comments Richard Wein (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 09:11:10 EDT)
Re: Some thoughts Richard Wein (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 06:57:34 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Richard Wein (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 06:51:53 EDT)
Re: conspiracy? - SEJ FAQ FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:36:24 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:14:17 EDT)
Re: conspiracy? - SEJ FAQ Stephen E. Jones (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:14:39 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 02:37:34 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 01:50:45 EDT)
Re: intelligence without a brain Ivar Ylvisaker (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 01:40:19 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:52:17 EDT)
Re: Posting from other resources FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:41:30 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:39:16 EDT)
Re: Posting from other resources DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:36:31 EDT)
Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution DNAunion@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:22:51 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID Nucacids@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:15:59 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:15:33 EDT)
Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? Ralph Krumdieck (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:20:55 EDT)
Re: Posting from other resources FMAJ1019@aol.com (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:04:03 EDT)
Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Creationist's credibility problem Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:44:26 EDT)
Re: Posting from other resources Susan Brassfield Cogan (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:42:03 EDT)
Evolutionary pathways FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:39:45 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:27:40 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:24:39 EDT)
Posting from other resources FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:20:35 EDT)
Re: Intelligence without a brain? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:17:50 EDT)
Re: Intelligence without a brain? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:14:36 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:05:33 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:53:36 EDT)
Re: Intelligence by Proxy - evolutionary algorithms FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:51:12 EDT)
Intelligence by Proxy - evolutionary algorithms DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:40:29 EDT)
Re: Intelligence without a brain? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:15:50 EDT)
Intelligence without a brain? DNAunion@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:13:55 EDT)
The "Evolutionary Algorithm" as Intelligence by Proxy Chris Cogan (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:47:13 EDT)
Re: Why I don't reject ID FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:51:24 EDT)
Re: Numerical Significance Chris Cogan (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:29:55 EDT)
Why I don't reject ID Nucacids@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:17:33 EDT)
Elsberry reviews Johnson FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 20:08:14 EDT)
More on Ruse FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:59:40 EDT)
Another good review of Dembski FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:52:57 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:29:08 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:26:11 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:19:57 EDT)
Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Stephen E. Jones (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 09:27:44 EDT)
Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? Stephen E. Jones (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 18:37:35 EDT)
Re: Michael Behe comments FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:58:21 EDT)
Re: Numerical Significance FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:57:32 EDT)
Re: Dembski and calls for examples FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:51:19 EDT)
Re: Behe and design inference: What does it mean? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:49:36 EDT)
Some thoughts FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:43:53 EDT)
Dembski and calls for examples Wesley R. Elsberry (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:19:39 EDT)
Re: Numerical Significance Vernon Jenkins (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:37:46 EDT)
Re: Michael Behe comments Brian D Harper (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:27:55 EDT)
Re: Michael Behe comments FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:08:23 EDT)
Dembski, science, and claims Wesley R. Elsberry (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:48:38 EDT)
Re: Michael Behe comments Richard Wein (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:00:58 EDT)
Re: Behe and design inference: What does it mean? Richard Wein (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:51:05 EDT)
Michael Behe comments FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:12:00 EDT)
Re: intelligence without a brain Chris Cogan (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:07:50 EDT)
Behe and design inference: What does it mean? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 16:42:17 EDT)
Re: intelligence without a brain Chris Cogan (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 15:36:56 EDT)
Re: intelligence without a brain FMAJ1019@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:10:36 EDT)
intelligence without a brain Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 13:03:09 EDT)
Re: intelligence without a brain billwald@juno.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 12:42:29 EDT)
intelligence without a brain Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 11:17:22 EDT)
Re: Glen Morton Waco Conference reports Richard Wein (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 06:33:27 EDT)

Last message date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 21:17:15 EDT
Archived on: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:56:18 EST

740 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:56:18 EST

Evolution - October 2000By Date

Evolution - October 2000
By Date