>>>Elsberry: I wonder what "articles" Jonathan Wells could have been talking
about?
At
<http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?program=CRSC%20Responses&command=v
iew&id=450>,
Mike Behe recounts his experience in trying to get a "reply to critics" text
published in research journals. Nowhere does Behe seem to say anything about
submitting actual research to a peer-reviewed research journal and having it
rejected. And even if Behe or someone else did have such an experience, it
needs to be put in the
context of how often an ordinary research paper gets rejected by those same
journals.
DNAunion: The problem is not that Behe was rejected: that happens all the
time to scientists. The "problem" is the grounds/reasons given by the
journals for rejecting Behe's material.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:09:05 EST