Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington

From: DNAunion@aol.com
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:04:17 EST

Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: Peer-review article submissions"

Previous message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Peer-review article submissions"
Maybe in reply to: Stephen E. Jones: "Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[...]

>>>Richard Wein: The ID work that I've read is unscientific because its
arguments are not logically sound. Of course, I haven't seen the papers that
Behe submitted to
journals. But, on the basis of the ID literature that I have seen, I would
assume that they were rejected for lack of scientific merit.

DNAunion: Here is some information on those papers Behe submitted and why
they were rejected.

http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?program=CRSC%20Responses&command=vi

ew&id=450

Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: Peer-review article submissions"
Previous message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Peer-review article submissions"
Maybe in reply to: Stephen E. Jones: "Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:04:47 EST