Re: Peer-review article submissions

From: Huxter4441@aol.com
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:05:54 EST

  • Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington"

    In a message dated 10/28/00 9:27:13 AM Eastern Standard Time,
    welsberr@inia.cls.org writes:

    << I wonder what "articles" Jonathan Wells could have been talking about?
     At
     
    <http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?program=CRSC%20Responses&command=v

    iew&id=450>,
     Mike Behe recounts his experience in trying to get a "reply to
     critics" text published in research journals. Nowhere does Behe seem
     to say anything about submitting actual research to a peer-reviewed
     research journal and having it rejected. And even if Behe or
     someone else did have such an experience, it needs to be put in the
     context of how often an ordinary research paper gets rejected by
     those same journals.
     
     Wesley >>

    A former colleague of mine is a victim of the antievolution conspiracy! He
    submitted a research paper to a peer-reviewed journal and it was REJECTED!!
    Obviouosly, there is a vast, anti-naturalistic materialism conspiracy being
    perpetrated by an elitist group of anti-Nature forces....



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:06:10 EST