Evolution - October 2000
By Author

Starting: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 06:34:35 EDT
Ending: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 21:17:15 EDT

• Allen Roy
  • Re: Flat earth (uneducated view) (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:59:31 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:44:05 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 20:41:14 EDT)
  • Flat earth (uneducated view) (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 02:07:20 EDT)
  • Flat Earth Myth (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 08:52:41 EDT)
• AutismUK@aol.com
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:06:22 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 02:24:31 EST)
• Bertvan@aol.com
  • Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 12:05:42 EST)
  • petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 16:26:58 EDT)
  • petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:41:24 EDT)
  • petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 08:35:13 EDT)
  • Is life an ubiquitous piece of the design of the universe? (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 12:26:04 EDT)
  • petty bickering academics (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 11:23:30 EDT)
  • petty bickering academics (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 10:14:20 EDT)
  • Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:54:17 EDT)
  • IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 09:37:19 EDT)
  • IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:21:47 EDT)
  • IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 14:53:12 EDT)
  • Do Materialists call everything they don't understand "mumbo jumbo"? (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 12:20:19 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 11:56:49 EDT)
  • Definition of intelligence (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 15:13:05 EDT)
  • Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 19:48:04 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:57:39 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 18:54:51 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 16:16:22 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:20:32 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:29:58 EDT)
  • The future for ID (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:12:42 EDT)
  • WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:48:41 EDT)
  • intelligence without a brain (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 13:03:09 EDT)
  • intelligence without a brain (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 11:17:22 EDT)
• Bill Payne
  • Re: Future of this list? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 21:47:42 EDT)
• bill r wald
  • Re: End of Darwinism? (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 22:47:15 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 16:23:31 EDT)
  • Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 14:26:04 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: Euphemisms and More (was What really killed T. Rex?) (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 17:18:15 EDT)
• billwald@juno.com
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 12:28:49 EDT)
  • Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 14:58:51 EDT)
  • Re: intelligence without a brain (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 12:42:29 EDT)
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 20:45:09 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:05:57 EDT)
  • Re: Michael Behe comments (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:27:55 EDT)
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger) (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 15:04:27 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:58:59 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:43:31 EST)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:28:09 EST)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:23:49 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 13:36:04 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:12:22 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:54:23 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:16:44 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:37:42 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:11:46 EDT)
  • Re: My rebuttal of the design inference (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:03:30 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:08:48 EDT)
  • Re: Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:21:15 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 02:53:09 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 02:27:56 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 15:48:22 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (and epistemology and dogmatism) (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 15:47:00 EDT)
  • How to prove supernaturalism? (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 02:10:44 EDT)
  • Re: inversion of magnetic fields (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:55:53 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:30:15 EDT)
  • Re: Evolution Elswhere? (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:53:32 EDT)
  • Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 02:46:51 EDT)
  • Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 16:38:48 EDT)
  • Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 03:22:43 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 02:01:19 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:39:23 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:32:07 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:31:54 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:31:12 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:44:02 EDT)
  • 47 aspects of evolution simulation programs (was Schutzenberger) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:42:37 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:36:23 EDT)
  • Re: Euphemisms and More (was What really killed T. Rex?) (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 01:53:22 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:31:48 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:31:35 EDT)
  • Euphemisms and More (was What really killed T. Rex?) (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 02:23:35 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 02:58:07 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 01:52:45 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 14:30:03 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 02:32:10 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:42:55 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:37:49 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 15:20:08 EDT)
  • Evolution Elswhere? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 03:38:35 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 02:40:45 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 14:10:06 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:43:44 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:14:57 EDT)
  • Re: Flat Earth Myth (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 16:45:17 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 10:47:03 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:20:14 EDT)
  • Genetic Rigidity? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:19:16 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:21:06 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:59:39 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:13:22 EDT)
  • Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 23:57:08 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:27:28 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:11:47 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 00:06:33 EDT)
  • ID and Creationism (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 23:56:26 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 23:42:43 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:24:51 EDT)
  • The "Evolutionary Algorithm" as Intelligence by Proxy (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:47:13 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:29:55 EDT)
  • Re: intelligence without a brain (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:07:50 EDT)
  • Re: intelligence without a brain (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 15:36:56 EDT)
• David Bradbury
  • Re: Evolution Elswhere? (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 23:23:29 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 21:31:17 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 22:55:01 EDT)
  • Flat Earth Myth (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 18:05:28 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:08:20 EDT)
• David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu
  • Re: Entropy (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 10:13:58 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 02:42:44 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:15:44 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:09:29 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy Erratum (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:12:44 EDT)
  • Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:12:37 EDT)
• Dawn
  • Uncommited Lurkers revsited (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 19:47:37 EDT)
  • This 'uncommited lurker' responds... (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:48:27 EDT)
• desiree0871@ladymailer.com
  • Network Marketing Works! (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:55:30 EDT)
• DNAunion@aol.com
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:12:59 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 18:50:50 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:49:23 EST)
  • Re: Peer-review article submissions (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:20:35 EST)
  • Re: Peer-review article submissions (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:08:40 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:04:17 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 18:23:41 EDT)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 13:27:55 EDT)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 11:53:28 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:10:29 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 17:13:13 EDT)
  • Huxter IS Pantrog, and Pangloss, and HandJobFromYourMom! (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:46:03 EDT)
  • Re: My rebuttal of the desin inference. (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 18:33:51 EDT)
  • Re: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:35:23 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:44:32 EDT)
  • anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:23:44 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:05:47 EDT)
  • Re: for SJones (was: mtDNA etc...) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:30:31 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:08:21 EDT)
  • Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:49:58 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:11:16 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:45:34 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:44:38 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:29:22 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:28:27 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:27:13 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:26:04 EDT)
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 14:42:11 EDT)
  • Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 14:21:06 EDT)
  • Re: Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:33:11 EDT)
  • Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 10:37:41 EDT)
  • Ccogan: Literally Infinite: stuff and Pentium's (and his growing "aggression") (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 10:08:37 EDT)
  • Ccogan: part 1: "literally infinite" problems (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 09:37:40 EDT)
  • Chris Cogan: Entropy (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 08:58:58 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:48:12 EDT)
  • Could it be that FMAJ finally gets it????? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:20:34 EDT)
  • Susan's at it again (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:47:26 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:43:14 EDT)
  • FMAJ and his outdated support of abiogenesis (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:55:48 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:48:06 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:03:04 EDT)
  • Design and abiogenesis (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:35:20 EDT)
  • Let's not give them too much (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:10:22 EDT)
  • Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 13:56:07 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 13:35:47 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 05:26:54 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 05:12:56 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 04:12:13 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 04:02:10 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 03:51:22 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:38:47 EDT)
  • Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:05:36 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:01:11 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 01:11:19 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:28:07 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) evolution of IC in computer model (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:23:19 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 20:22:24 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:44:58 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 12:51:56 EDT)
  • (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:33:52 EDT)
  • (non-flame post) in silico evolution (FPGAs) (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:27:13 EDT)
  • (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:57:28 EDT)
  • (non-flame post) evolution of IC in computer model (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:30:17 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:11:48 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:37:38 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:23:10 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:07:20 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:45:38 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:27:03 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:28:43 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:23:51 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 23:56:09 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 22:59:45 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 22:59:07 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 21:14:12 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 20:04:24 EDT)
  • Re: Natural selection and ID (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 19:42:51 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:18:28 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 13:51:21 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 13:23:29 EDT)
  • Re: Really? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:56:47 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:11:44 EDT)
  • Fwd: ID and Creationism (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:46:06 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:35:51 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:18:38 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:50:05 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:26:40 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:06:23 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:46:09 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:23:23 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:01:49 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:37:22 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:28:08 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:26:08 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:22:10 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:15:27 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:36:54 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:07:53 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 20:45:23 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:40:10 EDT)
  • Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:24:45 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:59:24 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:47:43 EDT)
  • Welsberry: Generic vs Specific (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 12:34:41 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 09:39:31 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 03:29:57 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:53:22 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:44:48 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:19:34 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:03:48 EDT)
  • Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:51:31 EDT)
  • Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:49:12 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:04:42 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 00:54:27 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:53:19 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:47:44 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:40:52 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:35:56 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 22:21:04 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:48:35 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:35:08 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:28:50 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 02:37:34 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:52:17 EDT)
  • Re: Posting from other resources (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:36:31 EDT)
  • Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:22:51 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:24:39 EDT)
  • Re: Intelligence without a brain? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:14:36 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:53:36 EDT)
  • Intelligence by Proxy - evolutionary algorithms (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:40:29 EDT)
  • Intelligence without a brain? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:13:55 EDT)
• Don Frack
  • RE: The Wedge Project (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:54:27 EDT)
  • RE: More on Ruse (Thu Oct 04 2001 - 21:17:15 EDT)
• Easy cash for all
  • Get paid to surf! Best programs here! (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 19:07:49 EDT)
• Ed.Babinski@furman.edu
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:40:37 EDT)
  • Nelson's "thought experiment" (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:34:50 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:18:01 EDT)
• Emm Foster
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 05:08:55 EDT)
• FMAJ1019@aol.com
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 03:08:25 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 02:48:24 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 02:41:47 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 21:46:20 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 20:10:55 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 20:08:45 EDT)
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:11:32 EDT)
  • Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:08:40 EDT)
  • Plonk (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:23:06 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:17:32 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:16:14 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk! (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:11:00 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:09:41 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:57:00 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:49:43 EDT)
  • Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:40:13 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:39:07 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 20:51:55 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:53:50 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:08:20 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:29:00 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:28:52 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:28:53 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:28:44 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:26:17 EDT)
  • Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:25:31 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:25:13 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:07:01 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:06:36 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:05:50 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:05:19 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:04:52 EDT)
  • Re: Flat earth (uneducated view) (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:01:59 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 00:45:01 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 00:39:39 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 15:21:09 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 15:18:05 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:19:29 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:16:51 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:03:27 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:08:46 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:07:12 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:51:38 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:47:05 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:44:17 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:39:43 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:38:05 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:33:21 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:16:59 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:14:50 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:10:35 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:57:02 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:25:18 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:08:56 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:42:00 EDT)
  • Natural selection and ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:34:45 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:21:23 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:06:24 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:46:03 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:59:33 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:55:15 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 22:57:08 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:49:23 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:27:23 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:20:28 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 21:09:16 EDT)
  • Re: The future for ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 15:18:09 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 12:49:15 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:38:46 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:36:39 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:34:18 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:31:51 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:23:10 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 02:17:59 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:56:49 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:53:58 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:47:40 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:27:00 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:23:30 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:18:36 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:04:20 EDT)
  • Re: conspiracy? - SEJ FAQ (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:36:24 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:14:17 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 01:50:45 EDT)
  • Re: Posting from other resources (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:41:30 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:39:16 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:15:33 EDT)
  • Re: Posting from other resources (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:04:03 EDT)
  • Evolutionary pathways (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:39:45 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:27:40 EDT)
  • Posting from other resources (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:20:35 EDT)
  • Re: Intelligence without a brain? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:17:50 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:05:33 EDT)
  • Re: Intelligence by Proxy - evolutionary algorithms (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:51:12 EDT)
  • Re: Intelligence without a brain? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:15:50 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:51:24 EDT)
  • Elsberry reviews Johnson (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 20:08:14 EDT)
  • More on Ruse (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:59:40 EDT)
  • Another good review of Dembski (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:52:57 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:29:08 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:19:57 EDT)
  • Re: Michael Behe comments (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:58:21 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:57:32 EDT)
  • Re: Dembski and calls for examples (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:51:19 EDT)
  • Re: Behe and design inference: What does it mean? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:49:36 EDT)
  • Some thoughts (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:43:53 EDT)
  • Re: Michael Behe comments (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:08:23 EDT)
  • Michael Behe comments (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:12:00 EDT)
  • Behe and design inference: What does it mean? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 16:42:17 EDT)
  • Re: intelligence without a brain (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:10:36 EDT)
• glenn morton
  • ICR suckered by April Fool's joke. (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 02:45:14 EDT)
• Hofmann, Jim
  • RE: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 19:45:42 EDT)
  • RE: News from Baylor U. (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:14:28 EDT)
• HOTSTOCKS@aba.com
  • HOT NEW BIOTECH STOCK - 2 NEWS RELEASES !! (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:34:46 EDT)
  • WHY SO MUCH SMART MONEY IS SO HIGH ON READ-RITE !! (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:43:05 EDT)
• Howard J. Van Till
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 15:41:45 EDT)
• Huxter4441@aol.com
  • Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:08:22 EST)
  • Re: But is it deception? (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:07:01 EST)
  • Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #3 (was for SJones, part 2) (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:04:44 EST)
  • Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #2 (was for SJones (was: mtDNA etc... (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:17:47 EST)
  • Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #1 (was for SJones (was: mtDNA etc... (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:02:16 EST)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 13:14:19 EST)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 07:13:21 EST)
  • Re: Peer-review article submissions (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:05:54 EST)
  • Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, K... (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:01:48 EST)
  • Re: loyal to the data? (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 13:00:27 EST)
  • Re: loyal to the data? (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:57:52 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:56:46 EST)
  • by the way (was 'But is it deception?) (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:12:08 EDT)
  • Re: But is it deception? (pat attn. SJones!) (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:10:24 EDT)
  • Re: End of Darwinism? (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:04:58 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 07:38:52 EDT)
  • Goodbye, little man (was: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion?) (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 09:27:37 EDT)
  • Re: Huxter IS Pantrog, and Pangloss, and HandJobFromYourMom! (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 09:04:35 EDT)
  • Re: My rebuttal of the design inference (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:17:03 EDT)
  • by the way (was anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion?) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:08:43 EDT)
  • Re: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:07:31 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:33:38 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:30:28 EDT)
  • Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 10:48:35 EDT)
  • Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 10:37:20 EDT)
  • for SJones, part 2 (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 07:39:20 EDT)
  • for SJones (was: mtDNA etc...) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 07:35:33 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:54:51 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 12:09:44 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:08:25 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:06:59 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 06:57:57 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 09:56:46 EDT)
  • I was hoping S.Jones would reply to this (was 'Mitochondrial DNA... (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 13:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 13:54:34 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:55:47 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 09:35:55 EDT)
  • Fwd: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 09:15:53 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:36:36 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:46:07 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:07:33 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:59:18 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 07:43:20 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 07:40:36 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 17:03:52 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:13:45 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:12:03 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:09:53 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:46:25 EDT)
  • evidence for ID in Nature (?)[re:Nelson Alonso] (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 11:38:12 EDT)
  • Re: Darwinist demographics (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: Response to Baylor (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:41:13 EDT)
  • muliplte persona alert! (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 10:28:01 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:26:11 EDT)
• Ivar Ylvisaker
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 22:46:23 EST)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 01:00:08 EDT)
  • Re: Turing (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:01:04 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 02:31:43 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 01:09:39 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:42:46 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:18:21 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:58:52 EDT)
  • Re: intelligence without a brain (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 01:40:19 EDT)
• Keith Littleton
  • RE: inversion of magnetic fields (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 16:03:34 EDT)
  • RE: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 10:08:07 EDT)
• li dorris
  • RE: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:55:30 EDT)
  • Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:04:30 EDT)
  • Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 19:28:19 EDT)
• M.A. Johnson
  • End of Darwinism? (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 18:16:11 EDT)
• Marcio Pie
  • inversion of magnetic fields (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 09:41:25 EDT)
  • using nDNA to infer human evolutionary history (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 07:17:12 EDT)
• Mark Isaak
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 21:45:32 EDT)
• MULLERD@chplink.chp.edu
  • Re:To all uncommitted lurkers (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:00:33 EDT)
• Nucacids@aol.com
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:10:30 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:02:47 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:52:58 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:07:20 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:03:01 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:56:48 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:50:30 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:45:33 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:42:00 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:24:42 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:18:09 EDT)
  • Re: Designing (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:03:47 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:50:24 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:46:57 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:34:44 EDT)
  • The Future for ID (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:01:25 EDT)
  • Re: Is Intelligent Design Creationism? (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 20:31:30 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:46:51 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 00:15:59 EDT)
  • Why I don't reject ID (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:17:33 EDT)
• Paul Nelson
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:26:05 EDT)
  • CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 11:54:06 EDT)
• Ralph Krumdieck
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 16:22:27 EST)
  • Rapid adaptation (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 16:43:26 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 10:59:55 EDT)
  • Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:36:15 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:31:24 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 17:30:17 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 14:44:15 EDT)
  • Re: Human designers vs. God-as-designer (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 11:15:48 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:30:36 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:20:55 EDT)
• Richard Wein
  • New list? (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 03:44:50 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 11:23:05 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 07:58:57 EDT)
  • Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 09:42:25 EDT)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 06:41:17 EDT)
  • More on Dembski and Baylor (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 03:22:57 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:56:00 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 05:34:19 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 19:51:09 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 12:09:24 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness & Purpose [wasRe: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 09:02:26 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 09:02:05 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:42:45 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 14:34:49 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 09:23:41 EDT)
  • My rebuttal of the design inference (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 13:56:53 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 07:31:06 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 21:09:42 EDT)
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 07:09:24 EDT)
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 06:52:52 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 06:53:59 EDT)
  • Re: Entropy (was Re: Human Designers vs. God-as-Designer) (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 05:19:45 EDT)
  • To all uncommitted lurkers (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:23:43 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 04:25:00 EDT)
  • Re: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 03:57:19 EDT)
  • Re: Baylor Lariat article on DI web site (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 14:33:28 EDT)
  • Re: Baylor Lariat article on DI web site (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 13:09:00 EDT)
  • Re: News from Baylor U. (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:02:54 EDT)
  • Re: News from Baylor U. (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 10:40:24 EDT)
  • Re: Evolution Elswhere? (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 08:42:49 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk! (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 21:47:28 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 21:46:12 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 21:08:35 EDT)
  • Re: Supernaturalism's Basic Flaws (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 04:24:31 EDT)
  • Re: 47 aspects of evolution simulation programs (was Schutzenberger) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 08:25:31 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 08:00:45 EDT)
  • Plonk! (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 06:25:28 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 23:50:06 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 11:29:42 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:13:43 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 19:13:57 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 18:37:40 EDT)
  • Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 13:22:59 EDT)
  • Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 11:05:27 EDT)
  • Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:43:16 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame) Dawkin's METHINKITISLIKEAWEASEL model (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:39:00 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) in silico evolution (FPGAs) (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:35:55 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:33:46 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) evolution of IC in computer model (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:28:56 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 04:10:17 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 04:17:06 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:49:58 EDT)
  • Re: Future of this list? (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 06:13:50 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:16:42 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:13:43 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:05:32 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 11:37:48 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 05:00:31 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:58:27 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:53:32 EDT)
  • Re: Reply to CCogan: Waste and computer evolution (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:44:20 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 18:30:57 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 05:48:56 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 04:44:09 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:17:10 EDT)
  • Re: Michael Behe comments (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 09:11:10 EDT)
  • Re: Some thoughts (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 06:57:34 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 06:51:53 EDT)
  • Re: Michael Behe comments (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:00:58 EDT)
  • Re: Behe and design inference: What does it mean? (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:51:05 EDT)
  • Re: Glen Morton Waco Conference reports (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 06:33:27 EDT)
• silk
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 04:53:29 EDT)
• Stephen E. Jones
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:58:48 EST)
  • Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:45:47 EST)
  • Re: But is it deception? (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:29:08 EST)
  • Re: More on Dembski and Baylor (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 17:19:01 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:51:58 EST)
  • Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #2 (was for SJones, part 2) (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:56:44 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 09:15:26 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:40:24 EST)
  • Re: What about nuclear DNA mutation rates? #1 (was for SJones (was: mtDNA etc...)) (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 08:32:18 EST)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 08:44:08 EST)
  • Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger) (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 01:51:22 EST)
  • Re: Schutzenberger and simulation (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 01:58:38 EST)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 01:00:54 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 23:53:52 EDT)
  • Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 19:58:05 EDT)
  • Re: loyal to the data? (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 19:50:52 EDT)
  • Re: `Do the calculation' (was My rebuttal of the design inference) (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 19:28:32 EDT)
  • God makes a comeback (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 18:30:31 EDT)
  • Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 19:11:46 EDT)
  • Baylor's dismissal of Polyani Center director Dembski was not a smart move (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 18:13:43 EDT)
  • Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 18:43:13 EDT)
  • when natural selection pumps its complexity up to the next level (was Schutzenberger) (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 18:40:14 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 19:06:58 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 19:08:01 EDT)
  • Re: anti-IDist asks who is DNAunion? (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 18:38:38 EDT)
  • Houston Chronicle on Demski's removal (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:48:10 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 18:03:15 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 18:02:04 EDT)
  • Re:To all uncommitted lurkers (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:22:29 EDT)
  • Re: This 'uncommited lurker' responds... (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:18:45 EDT)
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 19:11:50 EDT)
  • Let's not give them too much (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:34:09 EDT)
  • Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:12:47 EDT)
  • Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:25:15 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:52:43 EDT)
  • Re: Sinners vs. saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:02:15 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:01:06 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:55:39 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:41:46 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (and epistemology and dogmatism) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:28:46 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 01:14:01 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk! (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 01:00:54 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 00:57:21 EDT)
  • RE: Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 23:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.) (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 19:19:00 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 16:48:42 EDT)
  • Re: 47 aspects of evolution simulation programs (was Schutzenberger) (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:47:24 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:36:04 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:29:36 EDT)
  • Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 09:54:12 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 09:38:25 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 18:06:09 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk! (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 18:00:01 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:57:18 EDT)
  • Re: FAQ: Design and designer: Separate questions (was ID *does* require a designer! (but ...)) (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:54:09 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 07:28:38 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:50:31 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:50:47 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:26:39 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 06:56:45 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 04:35:24 EDT)
  • Re: I was hoping S.Jones would reply to this (was 'Mitochondrial DNA... (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 17:13:53 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 17:20:22 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #1 (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 04:35:59 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:14:34 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 20:19:07 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 20:10:28 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 19:43:01 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 19:30:44 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 17:48:38 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 17:07:39 EDT)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 16:50:12 EDT)
  • Re: Del Ratzsch new book: `Science & Its Limits' (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 16:53:39 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 16:34:19 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 19:38:21 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 17:03:22 EDT)
  • Re: Selection as "a Profoundly Informative Intervention" #1 (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 08:44:17 EDT)
  • Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 18:33:07 EDT)
  • Re: Future of this list? (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 18:01:39 EDT)
  • Re: understanding of what it means `to be (intelligently) designed' (was A THIRD OF U.S. SCHOOLS...) (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 17:22:28 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 10:42:24 EDT)
  • Re: its quite easy to accomodate faith and science (was ID vs. ?) (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 09:05:54 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 05:40:39 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 23:45:45 EDT)
  • Re: Posting from other resources (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 20:59:37 EDT)
  • Re: Design, Intelligent Design & irreducible complexity (was ID vs.?) (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 21:10:51 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 20:11:34 EDT)
  • Re: fear of the religious implications of design (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 06:47:32 EDT)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 19:28:29 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge Project (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 09:35:47 EDT)
  • Re: What really killed T. Rex? (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 17:06:22 EDT)
  • Re: conspiracy? - SEJ FAQ (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:14:39 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 09:27:44 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 18:37:35 EDT)
• Susan Brassfield Cogan
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 22:18:44 EST)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:14:33 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:49:01 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:32:45 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:59:20 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:52:40 EDT)
  • Re: Putting names in subject lines - a form of ad hominem? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:43:55 EDT)
  • Re: Presumption flawed (was Dr. Roland Hirsch) (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:36:01 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 22:26:02 EDT)
  • Re: To all uncommitted lurkers (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 09:57:19 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 21:29:34 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 23:18:23 EDT)
  • Re: A new private mailing list? (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 23:06:28 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 21:47:33 EDT)
  • The Value of Debate: For Bertvan (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 18:35:44 EDT)
  • Re: RM&NS and the whale (was But is it science) (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 09:25:28 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 09:05:05 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 08:59:26 EDT)
  • Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 23:01:16 EDT)
  • Re: Future of this list? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:44:16 EDT)
  • Re: Future of this list? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:42:07 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:00:33 EDT)
  • Re: The Future for ID (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:54:20 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:50:27 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 17:33:16 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 10:47:42 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:15:11 EDT)
  • Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 19:53:26 EDT)
  • Re: Molecular clocks running far faster and maximum human lifespan much longer? (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 15:27:40 EDT)
  • Re: Response to Baylor (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:01:56 EDT)
  • Re: muliplte persona alert! (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:35:35 EDT)
  • Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Creationist's credibility problem (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:44:26 EDT)
  • Re: Posting from other resources (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:42:03 EDT)
• Susan Cogan
  • Re: New list? (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 09:15:47 EST)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 12:53:28 EST)
  • Re: when natural selection pumps its complexity up to the next level (was Schutzenberger) (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 15:40:25 EDT)
  • Re: End of Darwinism? (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 09:13:07 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:29:28 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 15:26:02 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 10:33:03 EDT)
  • Re: Dembski and miracles (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 12:55:23 EDT)
  • Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 15:13:45 EDT)
  • Re: Do Materialists call everything they don't understand "mumbo jumbo"? (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 13:06:08 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:54:46 EDT)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 11:02:21 EDT)
  • Scientific Disagreements (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 15:53:44 EDT)
  • Re: Schutzenberger (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 15:20:26 EDT)
  • Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion) (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:56:04 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:53:38 EDT)
  • Re: Dr. Roland Hirsch (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 17:45:40 EDT)
  • Re: Why I don't reject ID (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:49:05 EDT)
  • Re: Nice ad hominem (was The Wedge Project) (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 10:40:27 EDT)
• SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:26:37 EDT)
• Tedd Hadley
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 14:11:39 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 17:26:37 EDT)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 12:45:07 EDT)
  • Re: End of Darwinism? (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 20:40:00 EDT)
  • Re: petty bickering academics (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:28:02 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #1 (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 16:56:08 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2 (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 13:14:45 EDT)
  • Re: Flat earth (uneducated view) (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 14:35:08 EDT)
  • Re: (non-flame post) in silico evolution (FPGAs) (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 18:25:22 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 14:06:16 EDT)
• Terry M. Gray
  • Future of this list? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:41:18 EDT)
• Troy Britain
  • RE: But is it deception? (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 03:31:39 EDT)
• Vernon Jenkins
  • Re: The Future for ID (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:07:44 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:48:19 EDT)
  • Re: Numerical Significance (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:37:46 EDT)
• Wesley R. Elsberry
  • Peer-review article submissions (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 11:08:17 EDT)
  • But is it deception? (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 01:22:11 EDT)
  • Dembski and miracles (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 11:49:18 EDT)
  • Turing (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 11:46:56 EDT)
  • Information request re: inclusion of ANS models as EA's (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 13:00:57 EDT)
  • Dembski's Meta-News post attracts faculty attention (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 12:56:32 EDT)
  • Baylor Lariat article on DI web site (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 12:17:13 EDT)
  • Baylor, the Polanyi Center, and Dembski (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 02:07:59 EDT)
  • News from Baylor U. (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 02:53:47 EDT)
  • Schutzenberger and simulation (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 05:28:00 EDT)
  • Dembski on A-E-S triad (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:04:04 EDT)
  • Re: Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 12:35:52 EDT)
  • Re: Information request (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 11:25:14 EDT)
  • Information request re: Dawkins' "weasel" algorithm (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 12:38:11 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 17:13:57 EDT)
  • Re: NS and intelligent designers (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:45:04 EDT)
  • NS and intelligent designers (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:29:04 EDT)
  • Designing (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:31:51 EDT)
  • Really? (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:00:29 EDT)
  • Re: Welsberry: Generic vs Specific (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 13:29:58 EDT)
  • Re: CSI, GAs, etc. (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 01:12:10 EDT)
  • Darwinist demographics (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:38:21 EDT)
  • Dembski and calls for examples (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 19:19:39 EDT)
  • Dembski, science, and claims (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:48:38 EDT)

Last message date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 21:17:15 EDT
Archived on: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:56:20 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 17:56:20 EST