At 10:53 AM 10/28/2000, you wrote:
>At Baylor the faculty didn't want ID debated .
>
>Silk here: Why what were they afraid of? Or did they use the old cop out
>"better ways to utilize resources"?
You mean, better ways to utilize resources than using them for the
development of obfuscation in support of crackpot pseudo-science theories?
Okay, but why would that be a cop out? Dembski has already proved that
resources spent on supporting his "work" are badly spent, so why should
Baylor continue wasting their money on him?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:34:24 EST