>>DNAunion: Gee, I must have missed Huxter's "compelling" evidence that I was
>a creationist, could you provide it to us? In fact, I even challenged him to
>provide a single valid piece of evidence showing that I am a creationist - no
>response from the Huxter. Why don't YOU Susan supply us with a single valid
>piece of evidence that I am a creationist.
>
>>Susan: hmmm . . . you don't seem to be following along. I asked Huxter to
>give me evidence that you were posting as multiple personnas. He replied with
>pages of evidence. I'm surprised you didn't see it.
>
>DNAUnion: Hmm, you don't seem to be following along. You stated I (and
>others at ARN) were creationists in direct response to Huxter's post about
>us. You gave absolutely no evidence for you faulty conclusion that we were
>creationists, so it "must" have been in Huxter's post. So where is his?
>Where is yours?
I've now twice explained why I think ID proponents are creationists (or a
subset of creationist).
>>Susan: since you have spent nearly all your time and focused on a six-line
>post from me that was mostly a joke, I have had no opportunity to learn what
>your positions are.
>
>DNAunion: You just contradicted yourself. First, you say I am a
>Creationist, and here you say you have not had the opportunity to learn what
>my positions are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO HOW IN THE HELL DID YOU CONCLUDE THAT
>I WAS A CREATIONIST!!!!!!! OUCH, THAT'S GOT TO HURT!!!!!!!
You have been clear that you are an ID proponent. IDists are a subset of
creationist. QED. That you find "creationist" to be an insult is neither
here nor there to me.
>>Susan: Fortunately the world is not limited by his education or imagination.
>
>DNAunion: Fortunately, the world does not rely on your ignorance.
this may be my last post directed at you. I enjoy debate. This isn't debate.
Susan
----------
I am aware that the conclusions arrived at in this work will be denounced
by some as highly irreligious; but he who denounces them is bound to shew
why it is more irreligious to explain the origin of man as a distinct
species by descent from some lower form, through the laws of variation and
natural selection, than to explain the birth of the individual through the
laws of ordinary reproduction.
---Charles Darwin
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:03:03 EDT