In a message dated 10/8/2000 10:29:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
DNAunion@aol.com writes:
> >FMAJ: Cool but a non sequitor. We do not have evidence of inteligent design
> as
> it applies to biology.
>
> >Nucacids: Ever hear of Dolly? Ever hear of a transgenic mouse? Or a
> rabbit
> that glows green when placed under a black light?
>
> >FMAJ: Interesting examples, but none apply to pre-existing biological
> systems. That humans can manipulate genes is still no evidence that this
> happened in the
> past.
>
> DNAunion: Your attempt at changing the subject to save face is noted.
>
Please explain the relevance of this to evidence of design? That we have
evidence of design in systems we know were designed is not evidence of design
in existing biological systems.
I like you ad hom though. Keep up the good work
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:29:03 EDT