In a message dated 10/1/2000 8:24:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time, DNAunion
writes:
> DNAunion: In another thread at ARN, I openely admitted that I was not
> knowledgable about RuBisCO before delving into a discussion where several
> of my thoughts were shown to be incorrect. Thus I do not feel comfortable
> having material on RuBisCO presented here (as it deals with a subject that
> I openly admitted to not being knowledgable about).
>
Then I apologize. I thought that your comments on Rubisco were quite helpful
although I disagreed with one aspect of your statement. I had not heard of
Rubisco and decided to search for "Rubisco and intelligent design" and was
directed to the ARN forum. I was also not aware at the time that I posted the
reference that you even were a participant to this group. I was looking for
references to understand the remarks made by NucAcids and I am still reading
through the 4 large pages found at ARN that discuss Rubisco and other topics.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 23:28:00 EDT