In a message dated 10/4/2000 2:32:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
FMAJ1019@aol.com writes:
<< > DNAunion: That sounds like an oxymoron to me. If you have any kind of
> intelligence and design involved in the selection process, then it is not
> NATURAL selection, be definition. What am I missing? >>
So ID is not natural? If something is not natural, is it then supernatural?
This subject, in the past, got the usual round of dictionary definitions and
such, but it seems that DNA is saying that Intelligent Design is beyond the
realm of the natural. If, in this instance, 'natural selection' were
designed, and DNA states emphatically that if design OR intelligence were
involved, it could not be natural, we can conclude that this means any
Intelligence that works via what appear to be natural means is therefore
supernatural. Or would it be extranatural?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:46:31 EDT