At 11:23 AM 10/16/2000, you wrote:
>It has been entertaining to show the problems in Intelligent Design but
>DNAUnion's arguments have become mainly ad hominem, repetitive and without
>any content so I have decided to kill file him. (Who was it that predicted
>DNA's behavior?).
>
>I should have done this earlier though but I am easily carried away when
>given the opportunity to expose the weak arguments of ID. Back to real
>science.
Chris
I will continue to glance at his posts, just to see if he decides to deal
with people's actual arguments rather than his mis-readings of them.
Fortunately, my E-mail programs make it easy to bunch up posts from one
person and trash them all at once if I decide that there's no value in any
of them.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:36:57 EDT