From: FMAJ1019@aol.com <FMAJ1019@aol.com>
>Interesting website of our dear friend Wells:
>
>I noticed this error in logic made by our dear friend Behe:
>
>"Jonathan Wells demonstrates with stunning clarity that the textbook
>examples Darwinists themselves chose as the pillars of their theory are all
>false or misleading. What does this imply about their scientific standards?
>Why should anyone now believe any of their other examples?"
>
>--Michael J. Behe, Professor Biological Sciences, Lehigh University,
>Pennsylvania
>
>I am somewhat disappointed in Michael though.
ID proponents *do* make a lot of logical errors, but I fail to see one in
the passage quoted above. Could you point it out for me, please?
Richard Wein (Tich)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:59:43 EDT